Decoding and encoding models reveal the role of mental simulation in the brain representation of meaning
David SotoiD, Usman Ayub SheikhiD, Ning MeiiD, Roberto SantanaiD
Abstract
How the brain representation of conceptual knowledge vary as a function of processing goals, strategies and task-factors remains a key unresolved question in cognitive neuroscience. Here we asked how the brain representation of semantic categories is shaped by the depth of processing during mental simulation. Participants were presented with visual words during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). During shallow processing, participants had to read the items. During deep processing, they had to mentally simulate the features associated with the words. Multivariate classification, informational connectivity and encoding models were used to reveal how the depth of processing determines the brain representation of word meaning. Decoding accuracy in putative substrates of the semantic network was enhanced when the depth processing was high, and the brain representations were more generalizable in semantic space relative to shallow processing contexts. This pattern was observed even in association areas in inferior frontal and parietal cortex. Deep information processing during mental simulation also increased the informational connectivity within key substrates of the semantic network. To further examine the properties of the words encoded in brain activity, we compared computer vision models - associated with the image referents of the words - and word embedding. Computer vision models explained more variance of the brain responses across multiple areas of the semantic network. These results indicate that the brain representation of word meaning is highly malleable by the depth of processing imposed by the task, relies on access to visual representations and is highly distributed, including prefrontal areas previously implicated in semantic control.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 19
- FWCI
- 1.08
- Field percentile
- top 27%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Visual and semantic representations predict subsequent memory in perceptual and conceptual memory tests
Simon W. Davis, Benjamin R. Geib, … Roberto Eduardo Luis Cabeza·Cerebral CortexPeer-reviewed·Aug 26, 2020
- Unaware Processing of Words Activates Experience-Derived Information in Conceptual-Semantic Brain Networks
Marta Ghio, Barbara Cassone, Marco Tettamanti·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Connecting Concepts in the Brain by Mapping Cortical Representations of Semantic Relations
Yizhen Zhang, Kuan Han, … Zhongming Liu·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Apr 20, 2020
- How does the brain represent the semantic content of an image?
Huawei Xu, Ming Liu, Delong Zhang·Neural NetworksPeer-reviewed·Jul 2, 2022
- When Abstract Becomes Concrete: Naturalistic Encoding of Concepts in the Brain
Viktor Nikolaus Kewenig, Gabriella Vigliocco, Jeremy I Skipper·eLifePeer-reviewed·Dec 5, 2024
- Modelling brain representations of abstract concepts
DANIEL H. KAISER, Arthur M. Jacobs, Radoslaw Martin Cichy·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 4, 2022