Biological PsychiatryNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Neurostructural Heterogeneity in Youth with Internalizing Symptoms
Antonia N. KaczkurkiniD, Aristeidis SotirasiD, Erica B. BalleriD, Ran BarzilayiD, Monica E. CalkinsiD, Ganesh B. ChandiD, Zaixu CuiiD, Güray ErusiD, Yong Fan AiD, Raquel E. GuriD, Ruben C. GuriD, Tyler M. MooreiD, David R. RoalfiD, Adon F.G. RoseniD, Kosha RupareliD, Russell Taki ShinoharaiD, Erdem VaroliD, Daniel H. WolfiD, Christos A. DavatzikosiD, Theodore Daniel SatterthwaiteiD
Abstract
Internalizing disorders such as anxiety and depression are the most common psychiatric disorders, frequently begin in youth, and exhibit marked heterogeneity in treatment response and clinical course. It is increasingly recognized that symptom-based classification approaches to internalizing disorders do not align with underlying neurobiology. An alternative to classifying psychopathology based on clinical symptoms is to identify neurobiologically-informed subtypes based on brain imaging data. We used a recently developed semi-supervised machine learning method (HYDRA) to delineate patterns of neurobiological heterogeneity within youth with internalizing symptoms using structural imaging data collected at 3T from a large community-based sample of 1,141 youth. Using volume and cortical thickness, cross-validation methods indicated a highly stable solution (ARI=.66; permutation-based pfdr < .001) and identified two subtypes of internalizing youth. Subtype 1, defined by smaller brain volumes and reduced cortical thickness, was marked by impaired cognitive performance and higher levels of psychopathology than both Subtype 2 and typically developing youth. Using resting-state fMRI and diffusion images not considered during clustering, we found that Subtype 1 also showed reduced amplitudes of low-frequency fluctuations in fronto-limbic regions at rest, as well as reduced fractional anisotropy in white matter tracts such as the parahippocampal cingulum bundle and the uncinate fasciculus. In contrast, Subtype 2 showed intact cognitive performance, greater volume, cortical thickness, and amplitudes during rest compared to Subtype 1 and typically developing youth, despite still showing clinically significant levels of psychopathology. Identification of biologically-grounded subtypes of internalizing disorders may assist in targeting early interventions and assessing longitudinal prognosis.
- organism: human
- assay: imaging
- research focus: clustering
- research focus: cell type annotation
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 55
- FWCI
- 3.78
- Field percentile
- top 6%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Neuroimaging profiling identifies distinct brain maturational subtypes of youth with mood and anxiety disorders
R. Ge, R. Sassi, … S. Frangou·bioRxiv·Aug 30, 2022
- Neurocognitive and Functional Heterogeneity in Depressed Youth
Erica B. Baller, Antonia N. Kaczkurkin, … Theodore Daniel Satterthwaite·NeuropsychopharmacologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 2, 2020
- Subtyping psychotic disorders using a data-driven approach reveals divergent cortical and cellular signatures
Lauren D. Hill-Bowen, Xi-Han Zhang, … Neil D. Woodward·Molecular PsychiatryPeer-reviewed·Jul 23, 2026
- Transdiagnostic electrophysiological subtypes reveal brain-behavior dimensions in youth psychiatry
Judie Tabbal, Aida Ebadi, … Mahmoud Hassan·bioRxiv·Aug 1, 2025
- Neuroanatomical Subtypes of Callous-Unemotional Traits in a Community Sample of Youth
Kristin A. Murtha, Mathilde Antoniades, … Rebecca E. Waller·bioRxiv·Jul 16, 2026
- Neurovegetative symptom subtypes in young people with major depressive disorder and their structural brain correlates
Yara Jo Toenders, Lianne Schmaal, … Christopher G. Davey·Translational PsychiatryPeer-reviewed·Apr 20, 2020