bioRxivEcology
Combined effect of matrix quality and spatial heterogeneity on biodiversity decline
I. Ramos, C. Gonzalez Gonzalez, A. L. Urrutia, E. Mora Van Cauwelaert, M. Benitez
Abstract
The land-sparing/land-sharing debate remains an oversimplified framework to evaluate landscape management strategies that aim to reconcile food production and biodiversity conservation. Still, biodiversity-yield curves, on which the framework has relied, provide valuable qualitative information on biodiversitys sensitivity to agricultural practices, and much research has studied this relationship. But the potential effect of landscape configuration on biodiversitys response to intensification has rarely been considered; besides, studies have often taken yield as an indicator of agricultural management and have generalized conclusions from studying particular taxonomic groups. In this work we adapt a metacommunity model to analyze factors that shape biodiversitys response to agricultural intensification while addressing some of the simplifications of the land-sparing/land-sharing dichotomy. In particular, we study species richness decline in landscapes encompassing a combined gradient in matrix quality and configurational heterogeneity of habitat patches, and considering community dynamics. We found that species richness along an intensification gradient shifts from following a robust response to presenting an abrupt decline, as landscape heterogeneity increases, as stricter survival thresholds are applied to species or as habitat area is reduced. Our work highlights the interdependent effects of heterogeneity, habitat availability and matrix quality on biodiversity and contributes to a nuanced understanding of ecological and landscape factors that enable a robust response of biodiversity in the face of spatiotemporal perturbations.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Quantity and quality of suitable matrices matter in reducing the negative effect of fragmentation on populations' extinction risk
B. Travassos-Britto, C. Hohlenwerger, … P. L. B. d. Rocha·bioRxiv·Aug 10, 2020
- Loss of species richness with land use intensity is explained by a reduction in niche differences.
O. Godoy, R. Granjel, … E. Allan·bioRxiv·Dec 15, 2022
- Pretty Good Yields allow the spatial management of multiple objectives in agricultural landscapes
Madeleine Kubasch, Manon Costa, Nicolas Loeuille·bioRxiv·Jul 9, 2026
- Extent of similarity between agricultural and natural land covers shapes how biodiversity responds to agricultural expansion at landscape scales
S. Wilson, N. Alavi-Shoushtari, … G. W. Mitchell·bioRxiv·Apr 22, 2020
- Landscape heterogeneity buffers biodiversity of meta-food-webs under global change through rescue and drainage effects
R. Ryser, M. R. Hirt, … U. Brose·bioRxiv·Jun 3, 2020
- Reconciling biodiversity conservation, food production and farmers’ demand
D. Montoya, S. Gaba, … M. Loreau·bioRxiv·Dec 5, 2018