bioRxivEcologyPreprint
Biodiversity knowledge and conservation shortfalls in Rivulidae fishes
João Henrique Alliprandini da CostaiD, Gustavo Henrique Soares GuedesiD
Abstract
The biodiversity crisis is exacerbated by persistent gaps in taxonomic, geographic, and conservation knowledge. This study provides a comprehensive assessment of Linnean, Wallacean, and conservation shortfalls in Rivulidae (Cyprinodontiformes), one of the most diverse families of Neotropical freshwater fishes. To this end, an extensive dataset was compiled, comprising 494 valid species, 51 synonyms, 3,419 occurrence records, and information on life cycle, distribution, and conservation status. The Linnean shortfall remains open: after 1975, the rate of species description increased sharply, and estimates indicate that 103 species remain undescribed (95% CI: 53-212). The year of species description was influenced by detectability and accessibility factors, with larger species, more widely distributed species, and species occurring in more densely populated areas being described earlier. The Wallacean shortfall was broad and spatially uneven: only 5.34% of the region was considered adequately sampled. The conservation shortfall was also substantial: 179 species are threatened with extinction, 69 species remain Not Evaluated, and 62 are Data Deficient. The mean time between taxonomic description and first IUCN extinction-risk assessment was 25.7 years. Moreover, 59.9% of species have no records within protected areas, including 69.3% of threatened species. These findings synthesize an urgent challenge: biodiversity knowledge and conservation shortfalls must be overcome simultaneously to protect species that are still being discovered, remain poorly documented spatially, and are restricted to habitats under intense anthropogenic pressure. The conservation of Rivulidae cannot wait for complete knowledge; action amid uncertainty is necessary to prevent both known and unknown species from disappearing.
- research focus: ecology & biodiversity
- research focus: database / resource
- research focus: benchmarking
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Characterising the spatio-temporal threats, conservation hotspots, and conservation gaps for the most extinction-prone bird family (Aves: Rallidae)
L. Leveque, J. C. Buettel, … B. W. Brook·bioRxiv·Jan 20, 2021
- Predicting the conservation status of Europe’s Data Deficient sharks and rays
R. H. L. Walls, N. K. Dulvy·bioRxiv·Apr 25, 2019
- Croaking for haste: How long does it take to describe a frog species since its discovery?
Albert Carné, Alberto Sánchez‐Vialas, … Ignacio De la Riva·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Jan 23, 2026
- Shortfalls and opportunities in terrestrial vertebrate species discovery
M. R. Moura, W. Jetz·bioRxiv·Oct 23, 2020
- The dynamic face of rarity: tracking species at risk beyond space
Everton A. Maciel·bioRxiv·Oct 14, 2026
- Species in big angiosperm genera are priorities for conservation
Matilda J. M. Brown, Tarciso C. C. Leão, … Eimear Nic Lughadha·bioRxiv·Sep 14, 2025