bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
A parsimonious model for mass-univariate vertex-wise analysis
Baptiste Couvy‐DuchesneiD, Futao ZhangiD, Kathryn E. KemperiD, Julia SidorenkoiD, Naomi R. WrayiD, Peter M. VisscheriD, Olivier ColliotiD, Jian YangiD
Abstract
2.Covariance between grey-matter measurements can reflect structural or functional brain networks though it has also been shown to be influenced by confounding factors (e.g. age, head size, scanner), which could lead to lower mapping precision (increased size of associated clusters) and create distal false positives associations in mass-univariate vertex-wise analyses. We evaluated this concern by performing state-of-the-art mass-univariate analyses (general linear model, GLM) on traits simulated from real vertex-wise grey matter data (including cortical and subcortical thickness and surface area). We contrasted the results with those from linear mixed models (LMMs), which have been shown to overcome similar issues in omics association studies. We showed that when performed on a large sample (N=8,662, UK Biobank), GLMs yielded large spatial clusters of significant vertices and greatly inflated false positive rate (Family Wise Error Rate: FWER=1, cluster false discovery rate: FDR>0.6). We showed that LMMs resulted in more parsimonious results: smaller clusters and reduced false positive rate (yet FWER>5% after Bonferroni correction) but at a cost of increased computation. In practice, the parsimony of LMMs results from controlling for the joint effect of all vertices, which prevents local and distal redundant associations from reaching significance. Next, we performed mass-univariate association analyses on five real UKB traits (age, sex, BMI, fluid intelligence and smoking status) and LMM yielded fewer and more localised associations. We identified 19 significant clusters displaying small associations with age, sex and BMI, which suggest a complex architecture of at least dozens of associated areas with those phenotypes.
- organism: human
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: statistical model
- approach: mixed model
- Citations
- 2
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Widespread associations between grey matter structure and the human phenome
Baptiste Couvy‐Duchesne, Lachlan T. Strike, … Peter M. Visscher·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Jul 20, 2020
- Voxel-wise and spatial modelling of binary lesion masks: Comparison of methods with a realistic simulation framework
Petya Kindalova, Ioannis Kosmidis, Thomas E. Nichols·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Apr 22, 2021
- Cross-validation for the estimation of effect size generalizability in mass-univariate brain-wide association studies
Janik Goltermann, Nils Ralf Winter, … Udo Dannlowski·bioRxiv·Mar 29, 2023
- One Model to Rule Them All: An Integrative Approach to Matrix-Based Analyses in Neuroimaging Connectomics
Gang Chen, Paul‐Christian Bürkner, … Luiz Pessoa·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Jun 12, 2019
- BLMM: Parallelised Computing for Big Linear Mixed Models
Thomas Maullin-Sapey, Thomas E. Nichols·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Nov 3, 2022
- How to improve parameter estimates in GLM-based fMRI data analysis: cross-validated Bayesian model averaging
Joram Soch, Achim Pascal Meyer, … Carsten Allefeld·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jun 29, 2017