Sign in
Evolutionary BiologybioRxiv

Assessing genomic admixture between cryptic Plutella moth species following secondary contact

C. Ward, S. W. Baxter

Abstract

Cryptic species are genetically distinct taxa without obvious variation in morphology and are occasionally discovered using molecular or sequence datasets of populations previously thought to be a single species. The world-wide Brassica pest, Plutella xylostella (diamondback moth), has been a problematic insect in Australia since 1882, yet a morphologically cryptic species with apparent endemism (P. australiana) was only recognized in 2013. Plutella xylostella and P. australiana are able to hybridize under laboratory conditions, and it was unknown whether introgression of adaptive traits could occur in the field to improve fitness and potentially increase pressure on agriculture. Phylogenetic reconstruction of 29 nuclear genomes confirmed P. xylostella and P. australiana are divergent, and molecular dating with 13 mitochondrial genes estimated a common Plutella ancestor 1.96{+/-}0.175 MYA. Sympatric Australian populations and allopatric Hawaiian P. xylostella populations were used to test whether neutral or adaptive introgression had occurred between the two Australian species. We used three approaches to test for genomic admixture in empirical and simulated datasets including i) the f3 statistic at the level of the population, ii) pairwise comparisons of Neis absolute genetic divergence (dXY) between populations and iii) changes in phylogenetic branch lengths between individuals across 50 kb genomic windows. These complementary approaches all supported reproductive isolation of the Plutella species in Australia, despite their ability to hybridize. Finally, we highlight the most divergent genomic regions between the two cryptic Plutella species and find they contain genes involved with processes including digestion, detoxification and DNA binding.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISPerry '18Perry '17Shogren '23Bickerstaff '24Hereward '20Nikelski '23
81% semantic matchGenetics
Kym D. Perry, Gregory J. Baker, Kevin Powis+3 more·BMC Evolutionary Biology·May 29, 2018· 23 citations