henhaobio
Sign in

bioRxivBioengineering

Augmented Transcutaneous Stimulation Using an Injectable Electrode

N. Verma, R. D. Graham, J. Mudge, J. K. Trevathan, M. Franke, A. J. Shoffstall, J. Williams, A. N. Dalrymple, L. E. Fisher, D. J. Weber, S. F. Lempka, K. A. Ludwig

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Minimally invasive neuromodulation technologies seek to marry the neural selectivity of implantable devices with the low-cost and non-invasive nature of transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES). The Injectrode(R) is a needle-delivered electrode that is injected onto neural structures under image guidance. Power is then transcutaneously delivered to the Injectrode using surface electrodes. The Injectrode serves as a low-impedance conduit to guide current to the deep on-target nerve, reducing activation thresholds by an order of magnitude compared to using only surface stimulation electrodes. To minimize off-target recruitment of cutaneous fibers, the energy transfer efficiency from the surface electrodes to the Injectrode must be optimized. TES energy is transferred to the Injectrode through both capacitive and resistive mechanisms. Electrostatic finite element models generally used in TES research consider only the resistive means of energy transfer by defining tissue conductivities. Here, we present an electroquasistatic model, taking into consideration both the conductivity and permittivity of tissue, to understand transcutaneous power delivery to the Injectrode. The model was validated with measurements taken from (n=4) swine cadavers. We used the validated model to investigate system and anatomic parameters that influence the coupling efficiency of the Injectrode energy delivery system. Our work suggests the relevance of electroquasistatic models to account for capacitive charge transfer mechanisms when studying TES, particularly when high-frequency voltage components are present, such as those used for voltage-controlled pulses and sinusoidal nerve blocks.

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISBhowmick '23Trevathan '19Mercadal '21Wu '26Dalrymple '21Botzanowski '22
77% semantic matchBioengineering
S. Bhowmick, R. D. Graham, N. Verma+8 more·bioRxiv·Sep 20, 2023