NeuroImageNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Callosal anisotropy predicts attentional network changes after parietal inhibitory stimulation
Selene SchintuiD, Catherine A. CunninghamiD, Michael FreedbergiD, Paul A. TayloriD, Stephen J. GottsiD, Sarah ShomsteiniD, Eric M. WassermanniD
Abstract
Hemispatial neglect is thought to result from disruption of interhemispheric equilibrium. Right hemisphere lesions deactivate the right frontoparietal network and hyperactivate the left via release from interhemispheric inhibition. Support for this theory comes from neuropsychological evidence as well as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies in healthy subjects, in whom right posterior parietal cortex (PPC) inhibition causes neglect-like, rightward, visuospatial bias. Concurrent TMS and fMRI after right PPC TMS show task-dependent changes but may fail to identify effects of stimulation in areas not directly activated by the specific task, complicating interpretations. We used resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) after inhibitory TMS over the right PPC to examine changes in the networks underlying visuospatial attention. In a crossover experiment in healthy individuals, we delivered continuous theta burst TMS to the right PPC and vertex as control condition. We hypothesized that PPC inhibitory stimulation would cause a rightward visuospatial bias, decrease PPC connectivity with frontal areas, and increase PPC connectivity with the attentional network in the left hemisphere. We also expected that individual differences in fractional anisotropy (FA) in white matter connections between the PPCs would account for variability in TMS-induced RSFC changes. As expected, TMS over the right PPC caused a rightward shift in line bisection judgment and increased RSFC between the right PPC and the left superior temporal gyrus. This effect was inversely related to FA in the posterior corpus callosum. Local inhibition of the right PPC reshapes connectivity in the attentional network and depends on interhemispheric connections.
- Citations
- 25
- FWCI
- 2.15
- Field percentile
- top 13%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Causal evidence for increased theta and gamma phase consistency in a parieto-frontal network during the maintenance of visual attention
Claire Bradley, Emily McCann, … Jason B. Mattingley·NeuropsychologiaPeer-reviewed·Jan 16, 2025
- Prism adaptation modulates connectivity of the intraparietal sulcus with multiple brain networks
Selene Schintu, Michael Freedberg, … Eric M. Wassermann·Cerebral CortexPeer-reviewed·Jan 30, 2020
- Attentional reorientation along the meridians of the visual field: are there different neural mechanisms at play?
Simon R. Steinkamp, Simone Vossel, … Ralph Weidner·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Jun 11, 2020
- Hemispheric Dissociation Revealed by Attentional Isolation and tRNS
Michele Tosi, Giulia Ellena, … Lorella Battelli·bioRxiv·Jun 17, 2025
- Effective connectivity and spatial selectivity-dependent fMRI changes elicited by microstimulation of pulvinar and LIP
Igor Kagan, Lydia Gibson, … Melanie Wilke·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jun 17, 2021
- Fronto-parietal networks shape human conscious report through attention gain and reorienting
Jianghao Liu, Dimitri J. Bayle, … Paolo Bartolomeo·Communications BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 15, 2023