henhaobio
Sign in

Nature CommunicationsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article

Pseudoreplication bias in single-cell studies; a practical solution

Kip D. ZimmermaniD, Mark Andrew EspelandiD, Carl D. LangefeldiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Cells from the same individual share a common genetic and environmental background and are not independent, therefore they are subsamples or pseudoreplicates. Thus, single-cell data have a hierarchical structure that many current single-cell methods do not address, leading to biased inference, highly inflated type 1 error rates, and reduced robustness and reproducibility. This includes methods that use a batch effect correction for individual as a means of accounting for within sample correlation. Here, we document this dependence across a range of cell types and show that pseudo-bulk aggregation methods are overly conservative and underpowered relative to mixed models. We propose applying two-part hurdle generalized linear mixed models with a random effect for individual to properly account for both zero inflation and the correlation structure among measures from cells within an individual. Finally, we provide power estimates across a range of experimental conditions to assist researchers in designing appropriately powered studies.

Citations
331
FWCI
14.42
Field percentile
top 1%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISMurphy '22Malfait '24Lee '23Wang '26Lazic '18Cao '17
70% semantic matchBioinformatics
Alan E Murphy, Nathan Skene·Nature Communications·Dec 22, 2022· 123 citations