NIMBus: a Negative Binomial Regression based Integrative Method for Mutation Burden Analysis
Jing ZhangiD, Jason J. LiuiD, Patrick D. McGillivrayiD, Caroline YiiD, Lucas LochovskyiD, Donghoon LeeiD, Mark GersteiniD
Abstract
BackgroundIdentifying frequently mutated regions is a key approach to discover DNA elements influencing cancer progression. However, it is challenging to identify these burdened regions due to mutation rate heterogeneity across the genome and across different individuals. Moreover, it is known that this heterogeneity partially stems from genomic confounding factors, such as replication timing and chromatin organization. The increasing availability of cancer whole genome sequences and functional genomics data from the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) may help address these issues. ResultsWe developed a Negative binomial regression-based Integrative Method for mutation Burden analysiS (NIMBus). Our approach addresses the over-dispersion of mutation count statistics by (1) using a Gamma-Poisson mixture model to capture the mutation-rate heterogeneity across different individuals and (2) estimating regional background mutation rates by regressing the varying local mutation counts against genomic features extracted from ENCODE. We applied NIMBus to whole-genome cancer sequences from the PanCancer Analysis of Whole Genomes project (PCAWG) and other cohorts. It successfully identified well-known coding and noncoding drivers, such as TP53 and the TERT promoter. To further characterize the burdening of non-coding regions, we used NIMBus to screen transcription factor binding sites in promoter regions that intersect DNase I hypersensitive sites (DHSs). This analysis identified mutational hotspots that potentially disrupt gene regulatory networks in cancer. We also compare this method to other mutation burden analysis methods. ConclusionNIMBus is a powerful tool to identify mutational hotspots. The NIMBus software and results are available as an online resource at github.gersteinlab.org/nimbus.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 5
- FWCI
- 0.09
- Field percentile
- 32th percentile
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Discovery and characterization of coding and non-coding driver mutations in more than 2,500 whole cancer genomes
Esther Rheinbay, Morten Muhlig Nielsen, … Gad A. Getz·bioRxiv·Dec 23, 2017
- A Site Specific Model And Analysis Of The Neutral Somatic Mutation Rate In Whole-Genome Cancer Data
Johanna Bertl, Qianyun Guo, … Asger Hobolth·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 19, 2018
- Transcription Factor-Centric Approach to Identify Non-Recurring Putative Regulatory Drivers in Cancer
Jingkang Zhao, Vincentius Martin, Raluca Gordân·Lecture notes in computer sciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2022
- Learning the mutational landscape of the cancer genome
M. A. Sherman, A. Yaari, … B. Berger·bioRxiv·Aug 3, 2021
- MutSpot: detection of non-coding mutation hotspots in cancer genomes
Yu Amanda Guo, Mei Mei Chang, Anders J. Skanderup·npj Genomic MedicinePeer-reviewed·Jun 5, 2020
- Passenger Hotspot Mutations in Cancer
Julian M. Hess, André Bernards, … Gad A. Getz·Cancer CellPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2019