henhaobio
Sign in

Cytometry Part ABioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article

cytometree: a binary tree algorithm for automatic gating in cytometry analysis

Daniel CommengesiD, Chariff Alkhassim, Raphaël GottardoiD, Boris P. HejblumiD, Rodolphe ThiébautiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

MotivationFlow cytometry is a powerful technology that allows the high-throughput quantification of dozens of surface and intracellular proteins at the single-cell level. It has become the most widely used technology for immunophenotyping of cells over the past three decades. Due to the increasing complexity of cytometry experiments (more cells and more markers), traditional manual flow cytometry data analysis has become untenable due to its subjectivity and time-consuming nature.\n\nResultsWe present a new unsupervised algorithm called \"cytometree\" to perform automated population discovery (aka gating) in flow cytometry. cytometree is based on the construction of a binary tree, the nodes of which are subpopulations of cells. At each node, the marker distributions are modeled by mixtures of normal distribution. Node splitting is done according to a normalized difference of Akaike information criteria (AIC) between the two models. Post-processing of the tree structure and derived populations allows us to complete the annotation of the derived populations. The algorithm is shown to perform better than the state-of-the-art unsupervised algorithms previously proposed on panels introduced by the Flow Cytometry: Critical Assessment of Population Identification Methods (FlowCAP I) project. The algorithm is also applied to a T-cell panel proposed by the Human Immunology Project Consortium (HIPC) program; it also outperforms the best unsupervised open-source available algorithm while requiring the shortest computation time.\n\nAvailabilityAn R package named \"cytometree\" is available on the CRAN repository.\n\nContactdaniel.commenges@u-bordeaux.fr; rodolphe.thiebaut@u-bordeaux.fr\n\nSupplementary informationSupplementary data are available.

Citations
23
FWCI
1.56
Field percentile
top 17%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISExner '24Minoura '19Burton '21Tursi '25Becht '18Ji '18
69% semantic matchBioinformatics
Tarik Exner, Nicolaj S. Hackert, Frederic Pohl+8 more·bioRxiv·Jul 26, 2024