Metabolomic-genomic prediction drastically improves prediction accuracy of breeding values in crop breeding
Xiangyu GuoiD, Pernille Merete SarupiD, Ahmed JahooriD, Just JenseniD, Ole Fredslund ChristenseniD
Abstract
Metabolomics is intermediate stage between genotype and phenotype, and therefore useful for breeding. Objective was to investigate heritabilities and accuracies of genetic evaluation of malting quality (MQ) traits by integrating both genomic and metabolomic information. In total, 2,430 plots of 562 malting spring barley lines from three years and two locations were included. Five MQ traits were measured in wort produced from each plot. Metabolomic features used were 24,018 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance intensities measured on each wort sample. Methods for statistical analyses were genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) and metabolomic-genomic best linear unbiased prediction (MGBLUP). Accuracies of predicted breeding values were compared using two cross-validation strategies: leave-one-year-out (LOYO) and leave-one-line-out (LOLO). Plot heritabilities ranged from 0.060 to 0.279 for GBLUP, and increased to range from 0.123 to 0.283 for MGBLUP. LOLO scheme yielded higher accuracies than LOYO scheme, and MGBLUP yielded higher accuracies than GBLUP regardless of cross-validation scheme. Author SummaryMetabolomics is intermediate stage between genotype and phenotype, and therefore useful for breeding. We carried out a study on 2,430 plots of 562 malting spring barley lines and 24,018 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance intensities measured on each wort sample, to investigate the prediction of breeding values of five malting quality traits by integrating genomic and metabolomic information using a metabolomics-genomic model. Results showed an increase in prediction accuracy for this model compared to a genomic model.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 18
- FWCI
- 2.98
- Field percentile
- top 7%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Genomic prediction for malting quality traits in practical barley breeding programs
Pernille Merete Sarup, Vahid Edriss, … Just Jensen·bioRxiv·Jul 30, 2020
- Comparative assessment of genomic, phenomic, and metabolomic prediction models in biparental grapevine breeding populations
Clémentine Borrelli, Louise Delannoy, … Komlan Avia·bioRxiv·Oct 24, 2025
- Generalizable approaches for genomic prediction of metabolites in plants
Lauren J. Brzozowski, Malachy T. Campbell, … Jean‐Luc Jannink·The Plant GenomePeer-reviewed·Apr 25, 2022
- Bivariate genomic prediction of phenotypes by selecting epistatic interactions across years
Elaheh Vojgani, Torsten Pook, … Henner Simianer·bioRxiv·Nov 18, 2020
- Genomic Selection for End-Use Quality and Processing Traits in Soft White Winter Wheat Breeding Program with Machine and Deep Learning Models
Karansher Singh Sandhu, Meriem Aoun, … Arron Hyrum Carter·BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 20, 2021
- Phenomic vs Genomic Prediction - A Comparison of Prediction Accuracies for Grain Yield in Hard Winter Wheat Lines
Z. J. Winn, A. Amsberry, … E. Mason·bioRxiv·Jul 19, 2023