Sign in
NeuroscienceJournal of Neuroscience
Peer-reviewed journal article

Long-horizon associative learning explains human sensitivity to statistical and network structures in auditory sequences

Lucas BenjaminiD, Mathias Sablé-MeyeriD, Ana FlóiD, Ghislaine Dehaene‐LambertziD, Fosca Al RoumiiD

Abstract

Networks are a useful mathematical tool for capturing the complexity of the world. In a previous behavioral study, we showed that human adults were sensitive to the high-level network structure underlying auditory sequences, even when presented with incomplete information. Their performance was best explained by a mathematical model compatible with associative learning principles, based on the integration of the transition probabilities between adjacent and non-adjacent elements with a memory decay. In the present study, we explored the neural correlates of this hypothesis via magnetoencephalography (MEG). Participants passively listened to sequences of tones organized in a sparse community network structure comprising two communities. An early difference (~150 ms) was observed in the brain responses to tone transitions with similar transition probability but occurring either within or between communities. This result implies a rapid and automatic encoding of the sequence structure. Using time-resolved decoding, we estimated the duration and overlap of the representation of each tone. The decoding performance exhibited exponential decay, resulting in a significant overlap between the representations of successive tones. Based on this extended decay profile, we estimated a long-horizon associative learning novelty index for each transition and found a correlation of this measure with the MEG signal. Overall, our study sheds light on the neural mechanisms underlying human sensitivity to network structures and highlights the potential role of Hebbian-like mechanisms in supporting learning at various temporal scales.

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
12
FWCI
2.91
Field percentile
top 9%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISBenjamin '23Martinez '19Benjamin '26Ren '22Christensen '26Henin '21
74% semantic matchNeuroscience
Lucas Benjamin, Ana Fló, Fosca Al Roumi+1 more·eLife·May 2, 2023· 16 citations