Computational and Structural Biotechnology JournalGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article
Wide and Deep Learning for Automatic Cell Type Identification
Christopher M. WilsoniD, Brooke L. FridleyiD, Jose Ramon Conejo-GarciaiD, Xuefeng WangiD, Xiaoqing YuiD
Abstract
Cell type classification is an important problem in cancer research, especially with the advent of single cell technologies. Correctly identifying cells within the tumor microenvironment can provide oncologists with a snapshot of how a patients immune system is reacting to the tumor. Wide deep learning (WDL) is an approach to construct a cell-classification prediction model that can learn patterns within high-dimensional data (deep) and ensure that biologically relevant features (wide) remain in the final model. In this paper, we demonstrate that the use of regularization can prevent overfitting and adding a wide component to a neural network can result in a model with better predictive performance. In particular, we observed that a combination of dropout and{ell} 2 regularization can lead to a validation loss function that does not depend on the number of training iterations and does not experience a significant decrease in prediction accuracy compared to models with{ell} 1, dropout, or no regularization. Additionally, we show WDL can have superior classification accuracy when the training and testing of a model is completed data on that arise from the same cancer type, but from different platforms. More specifically, WDL compared to traditional deep learning models can substantially increase the overall cell type prediction accuracy (41 to 90%) and T-cell sub-types (CD4: 0 to 76%, and CD8: 61 to 96%) when the models were trained using melanoma data obtained from the 10X platform and tested on basal cell carcinoma data obtained using SMART-seq.
- organism: human
- assay: scRNA-seq
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: deep learning
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 11
- FWCI
- 0.78
- Field percentile
- top 34%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Deep learning does not outperform classical machine learning for cell-type annotation
Niklas Köhler, Maren Büttner, … Fabian Joachim Theis·bioRxiv·Jun 24, 2021
- A novel deep learning pipeline for cell typing and phenotypic marker quantification in multiplex imaging
E. Markovits, T. Dankovich, … O. Zelichov·bioRxiv·Nov 9, 2022
- Label-free tumor cells classification using deep learning and high-content imaging
Chawan Piansaddhayanon, Chonnuttida Koracharkornradt, … Sira Sriswasdi·Scientific DataPeer-reviewed·Aug 26, 2023
- DeepLUAD: An efficient approach for lung adenocarcinoma pattern classification
Ahmed Bouziane, Ala Eddine Boudemia, … Mahdjoub Hamdi·bioRxiv·May 6, 2022
- A deep learning approach for Pan-Renal Cell Carcinoma classification and survival prediction from histopathology images
S. Tabibu, P. K. Vinod, C. V. Jawahar·bioRxiv·Feb 24, 2019
- Detection of live breast cancer cells in brightfield microscopy images containing white blood cells by image analysis and deep learning
Golnaz Moallem, Adity A. Pore, … Siva A. Vanapalli·Journal of Biomedical OpticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 13, 2022