Scientific ReportsNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Detection of task-relevant and task-irrelevant motion sequences: application to motor adaptation in goal-directed and whole-body movements
Abstract
Motor variability is inevitable in our body movements and is discussed from several various perspectives in motor neuroscience and biomechanics; it can originate from the variability of neural activities, it can reflect a large degree of freedom inherent in our body movements, it can decrease muscle fatigue, or it can facilitate motor learning. How to evaluate motor variability is thus a fundamental question in motor neuroscience and biomechanics. Previous methods have quantified (at least) two striking features of motor variability; the smaller variability in the task-relevant dimension than in the task-irrelevant dimension and the low-dimensional structure that is often referred to as synergy or principal component. However, those previous methods were not only unsuitable for quantifying those features simultaneously but also applicable in some limited conditions (e.g., a method cannot consider motion sequence, and another method cannot consider how each motion is relevant to performance). Here, we propose a flexible and straightforward machine learning technique that can quantify task-relevant variability, task-irrelevant variability, and the relevance of each principal component to task performance while considering the motion sequence and the relevance of each motion sequence to task performance in a data-driven manner. We validate our method by constructing a novel experimental setting to investigate goal-directed and whole-body movements. Furthermore, our setting enables the induction of motor adaptation by using perturbation and evaluating the modulation of task-relevant and task-irrelevant variabilities through motor adaptation. Our method enables the identification of a novel property of motor variability; the modulation of those variabilities differs depending on the perturbation schedule. Although a gradually imposed perturbation does not increase both task-relevant and task-irrelevant variabilities, a constant perturbation increases task-relevant variability.
- Citations
- 24
- FWCI
- 2.18
- Field percentile
- top 13%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- High variability impairs motor learning regardless of whether it affects task performance
Marco Cardis, Maura Casadio, Rajiv Ranganathan·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 27, 2017
- Motor variability prior to learning is a poor predictor of the ability to adopt new movement solutions
Rajiv Ranganathan, Marco Lin, … Chandramouli Krishnan·bioRxiv·Oct 23, 2020
- Augmentation of task-relevant variability enhances consolidation of motor learning
Mattia Pagano, Gaia Stochino, … Rajiv Ranganathan·bioRxiv·Jun 3, 2021
- Cutting through the noise: reducing bias in motor adaptation analysis
Daniel H. Blustein, Ahmed W. Shehata, … Jonathon W. Sensinger·bioRxiv·Nov 25, 2020
- Modulation of error sensitivity during motor learning across time, space and environment variability
Dmitry Todorov, Maelys Moulin, … Romain Quentin·bioRxiv·May 30, 2025
- Task relevance selectively modulates sensorimotor adaptation in the presence of multiple prediction errors.
Somesh N Shingane, Nishant Rao, … Pratik K. Mutha·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 17, 2025