bioRxivPreprint
Statistical Evidence for Common Ancestry: Testing for Signal in Silent Sites
Abstract
O_LIThe common ancestry of life is supported by an enormous body of evidence and is universally accepted within the scientific community. However, some potential sources of data that can be used to test the thesis of common ancestry have not yet been formally analyzed.\nC_LIO_LIWe developed a new test of common ancestry based on nucleotide sequences at amino acid invariant sites in aligned homologous protein coding genes. We reasoned that since nucleotide variation at amino acid invariant sites is selectively neutral and, thus, unlikely to be due to convergent evolution, the observation that an amino acid is consistently encoded by the same codon sequence in different species could provide strong evidence of their common ancestry. Our method uses the observed variation in codon sequences at amino acid invariant sites as a test statistic, and compares such variation to that which is expected under three different models of codon frequency under the alternative hypothesis of separate ancestry. We also examine hierarchical structure in the nucleotide sequences at amino acid invariant sites and quantified agreement between trees generated from amino acid sequence and those inferred from the nucleotide sequences at amino acid invariant sites.\nC_LIO_LIWhen these tests are applied to the primate families as a test case, we find that observed nucleotide variation at amino acid invariant sites is considerably lower than nucleotide variation predicted by any model of codon frequency under separate ancestry. Phylogenetic trees generated from amino-acid invariant site nucleotide data agree with those generated from protein-coding data, and there is far more hierarchical structure in amino-acid invariant site data than would be expected under separate ancestry.\nC_LIO_LIWe definitively reject the separate ancestry of the primate families, and demonstrate that our tests can be applied to any group of interest to test common ancestry.\nC_LI
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Statistical evidence for common ancestry: New tests of universal ancestry
Bret Larget, Cécile Ané, … David A. Baum·bioRxiv·Jan 10, 2016
- Infinitely Long Branches and an Informal Test of Common Ancestry
Leonardo de Oliveira Martins, David Posada·bioRxiv·Aug 4, 2015
- Codon Use and Aversion is Largely Phylogenetically Conserved Across the Tree of Life
J. B. Miller, L. M. McKinnon, … P. G. Ridge·bioRxiv·May 29, 2019
- Ancestree: unified likelihood inference of ancestral alleles under supplied or inferred genealogies
Janek Sendrowski, Thomas M Bataillon·bioRxiv·Sep 13, 2026
- Why do phylogenomic analyses of early animal evolution continue to disagree? Sites in different structural environments yield different answers
Akanksha Pandey, Edward L. Braun·bioRxiv·Aug 26, 2018
- Accounting for ambiguity in ancestral sequence reconstruction
A. Oliva, S. Pulicani, … S. Guindon·bioRxiv·Sep 5, 2018