Synaptic-state-dependent plasticity routes learning signals in recurrent circuits
Denis TurcuiD, Jonathan H. CornfordiD, Sven DorkenwaldiD, Ştefan MihalaşiD
Abstract
Synapses differ in molecular and ultrastructural state, but the computational role of this heterogeneity remains unclear and computational models do not account for it. Local Hebbian-like plasticity is well supported experimentally, whereas learning complex behaviors most likely requires non-local credit-assignment signals. Recent cortical electron microscopy data suggest that strong and weak synapses occupy distinct structural states, with large synapses often containing a spine apparatus that can alter calcium dynamics and plasticity. Here, we assigned different computational roles to different morphological synaptic types: we asked how networks with state-dependent plasticity operate and whether the mechanisms and structural features they develop are consistent with biological observations. We built a plasticity-switching recurrent neural network (psRNN) in which synaptic state is modeled by recurrent-weight thresholds. Synapses in the low-weight state use a local Hebbian-like rule, whereas synapses in the high-weight state receive an idealized non-local credit-assignment signal implemented with backpropagation through time. psRNNs learned cognitive tasks with temporal and working-memory demands in fewer trials than fully backpropagation-trained RNNs, despite routing BP-based updates to fewer recurrent weights. The advantage arose from three interacting mechanisms: 1) Hebbian-like updates exposed the credit-assignment component to several nearby parameter configurations, 2) the network dynamically built a task-relevant recurrent initialization, and 3) synapses switched into the credit-assignment subset before Hebbian growth destabilized learning. Structurally, trained psRNNs produced more anti-symmetric weights, lower effective rank, and stronger feedforward structure than control RNNs. Our results shed light on the computational role of heterogeneous synapses, which may regulate distinct types of learning signals, and we generate falsifiable predictions for connectomic analyses of recurrent cortical circuits.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Burst-dependent synaptic plasticity can coordinate learning in hierarchical circuits
Alexandre Payeur, Jordan Guerguiev, … Richard Naud·Nature NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·May 13, 2021
- Redundancy in synaptic connections enables neurons to learn optimally
Naoki Hiratani, Tomoki Fukai·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Jul 2, 2018
- Synapse-type-specific competitive Hebbian learning forms functional recurrent networks
Samuel Eckmann, Edward James Young, Julijana Gjorgjieva·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Jun 13, 2024
- Hebbian Wiring Plasticity Generates Efficient Network Structures for Robust Inference with Synaptic Weight Plasticity
Naoki Hiratani, Tomoki Fukai·bioRxiv·Dec 23, 2015
- Heterogeneous plasticity rules generate diverse structures in recurrent networks
Claudia Cusseddu, Dylan Festa, … Julijana Gjorgjieva·bioRxiv·Oct 27, 2026
- Two-stage synaptic plasticity enables memory consolidation during neuronal burst firing regimes
Kathleen Jacquerie, Danil Tyulmankov, … Guillaume Drion·bioRxiv·Apr 12, 2025