Human force control may trade-off force error with central tendency and recency biases

Abstract

Understanding how humans control force is useful for understanding human movement behaviors and sensorimotor control. However, it is not well understood how the human nervous system handles different control criteria such as accuracy and energetic cost. We conducted force tracking experiments where participants applied force isometrically while receiving visual force feedback, tracking step changes in target forces. The experiments were designed to disambiguate different plausible objective function components. We found that force tracking error was largely explained by a trade-off between error-reducing tendency and force biases, but we did not need to include an effort-saving tendency. Central tendency bias, which is a shift towards the center of the task distribution, and recency bias, which is a shift towards recent action, were necessary to explain many of our observations. Surprisingly, we did not observe such biases when we removed force requirements for pointing to the target, suggesting that such biases may be task-specific. This study provides insights into the broader field of motor control and human perceptions where behavioral or perceptual biases are involved.