Modeling cetacean eDNA distribution along the Washington coast using metabarcoding from opportunistic samples and generalized additive models
Tania Valdivia‐CarrilloiD, Megan ShafferiD, Kim M. ParsonsiD, Ally Im, Andrew Olaf SheltoniD, Eiren K. JacobsoniD, Abigail H. WellsiD, Ana Ramón‐LacaiD, Krista M. NicholsiD, Ryan P. KellyiD, Amy M. Van CiseiD
Abstract
Effective cetacean conservation depends on robust monitoring, yet traditional visual and passive-acoustic surveys have constraints. We evaluated environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding coupled with species distribution modeling (SDM) as a tool to study habitat use of cetaceans along the Washington State coast, USA. Seawater was collected at the surface and at a 50 m depth from 43 sites (86 samples) during the 2019 U.S.-Canada Integrated Ecosystem & Acoustic-Trawl Survey. A partial section of the mitochondrial control region was amplified with cetacean - specific primers, sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq, and taxonomically assigned with a curated reference database. Nine species were detected; we modelled the three most frequent: Pacific white-sided dolphin (Lagenorhynchus obliquidens) (10 detections), humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) (8 detections), and Rissos dolphin (Grampus griseus) (6 detections). Binomial generalized additive models related presence-absence to bathymetry, distance to shore, longitude, slope, and sea-surface temperature; model performance was assessed with stratified five-fold cross-validation. SDMs explained 17-51% of null deviance and presented high specificity ([≥] 0.80). The Pacific white-sided dolphin showed the highest eDNA presence probabilities offshore, beyond the shelf break. Humpback whale eDNA presence probabilities showed hotspots along the shelf break with secondary high-probability patches in near-shore waters. Rissos dolphin eDNA presence probabilities were elevated in offshore zones characterized by steep bathymetric gradients, particularly northwest of the sampled transect. These spatial patterns are consistent with historical visual-acoustic records, suggesting that eDNA-informed SDMs can capture cetacean habitat use. This proof of concept indicates that combining eDNA detections with flexible SDMs could provide a cost-effective, non-invasive complement to conventional surveys and may offer a scalable pathway for marine-mammal monitoring and spatial planning.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Environmental DNA as a complementary tool for biodiversity monitoring: A multi-technique and multi-trophic approach to investigate cetacean distribution and feeding ecology
Luís Afonso, Joana Costa, … Catarina Magalhães·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Oct 16, 2024
- Utility of Occupancy Models with Environmental DNA (eDNA) fromOlympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary
Christopher Paight, Jenny Waddell, Matthew P. Galaska·bioRxiv·Aug 4, 2021
- Pollution and Anthropogenic Stressors Are Associate with Cetacean Vulnerability in Coastal Waters: Fine-Scale Diagnostics from eDNA and Multispecies Modeling
Thilina Sudarshana Nimalrathna, Isis Guibert, … Mathew Seymour·Journal of Hazardous MaterialsPeer-reviewed·Aug 10, 2026
- Environmental DNA reveals fine scale spatial and temporal variation of prey species for marine mammals in a Scottish marine protected area
E. Boyse, K. P. Robinson, … S. J. Goodman·Environmental DNAPeer-reviewed·Jul 22, 2024
- Surface-sourced eDNA to track deep-diver cetaceans: the study case of Cuvier's beaked whale (Ziphius cavirostris) at Caprera Canyon and surrounding areas (Western Mediterranean Sea)
G. Boldrocchi, L. Conte, … E. Valsecchi·bioRxiv·Nov 7, 2023
- Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding of pond water as a tool to survey conservation and management priority mammals
Lynsey R. Harper, Lori Lawson Handley, … Bernd Hänfling·Biological ConservationPeer-reviewed·Sep 3, 2019