Fast feature- and category-related parafoveal previewing support natural visual exploration.
Abstract
Studies on vision tend to prevent or control eye movements, while humans naturally saccade every [~]250 ms. As the oculomotor system takes [~]100 ms to initiate and execute a saccade, this leaves only [~]150 ms to identify the fixated object and select the next saccade goal. This is very little time, suggesting that vision relies on parafoveal processing before and after the eye movement. However, evidence of high-level parafoveal access is sparse. The purpose of our study was to use magnetoencephalography (MEG) combined with eye-tracking and multivariate pattern analysis to identify the neuronal dynamics of parafoveal processing which support natural visual exploration. We demonstrated that future saccade goals in the parafovea could be decoded at the feature and category level peaking at [~]90 ms and [~]160 ms respectively. Simultaneously, decoding of fixated objects at the feature and category level peaked at [~]70 ms and [~]145 ms respectively. Also decoding feature and category specific neuronal information related to past parafoveal objects were sustained for [~]230 ms after saccading away from them. The feature and category of objects in the parafovea could only be decoded if they were in the saccade goal. In sum, we provide insight on the neuronal mechanism of pre-saccadic attention by demonstrating that feature and category specific information of foveal and parafoveal objects can be extracted in succession within a [~]150 ms time-interval and may serve to plan the next saccade. This information is maintained also after fixations and may support integration across the full visual scene. Our study provides novel insight on the temporal dynamics of foveal and parafoveal processing at the feature and semantic levels during natural visual exploration.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Neural Sharpening of Object Categories Through Parafoveal Priming
Syanah C. Wynn, Yulia Bezsudnova, Ole B. Jensen·Communications BiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 7, 2026
- The representation of stimulus features during stable fixation and active vision
Caoimhe Moran, Philippa Anne Johnson, … Ayelet Nina Landau·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 29, 2025
- Reading ahead: Localized neural signatures of parafoveal word processing and skipping decisions
Graham Flick, Liina Pylkkänen A·bioRxiv·Apr 25, 2025
- Post-saccadic face processing is modulated by pre-saccadic preview: Evidence from fixation-related potentials
Antimo Buonocore, Olaf Dimigen, David Melcher·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 30, 2020
- Neural responses during natural vision are action-timed rather than locked to the onset of stable foveal input
Carmen Amme, P. Sulewski, … T. Kietzmann·bioRxiv·Oct 25, 2024
- Cortical dynamics of saccade-target selection during free-viewing of natural scenes
Linda Henriksson, Kaisu Ölander, Riitta Hari·bioRxiv·Sep 19, 2016