Self-generation and sound intensity interactively modulate perceptual bias, but not perceptual sensitivity
Abstract
The ability to distinguish self-generated stimuli from those caused by external sources is critical for all behaving organisms. Although many studies point to a sensory attenuation of self-generated stimuli, recent evidence suggests that motor actions can result in either attenuated or enhanced perceptual processing depending on the environmental context (i.e., stimulus intensity). The present study employed 2-AFC sound detection and loudness discrimination tasks to test whether sound source (self- or externally-generated) and stimulus intensity (supra- or near-threshold) interactively modulate detection ability and loudness perception. Self-generation did not affect detection and discrimination sensitivity (i.e., detection thresholds and Just Noticeable Difference, respectively). However, in the discrimination task, we observed a significant interaction between self-generation and intensity on perceptual bias (i.e. Point of Subjective Equality). Supra-threshold self-generated sounds were perceived softer than externally-generated ones, while at near-threshold intensities self-generated sounds were perceived louder than externally-generated ones. Our findings provide empirical support to recent theories on how predictions and signal intensity modulate perceptual processing, pointing to interactive effects of intensity and self-generation that seem to be driven by a biased estimate of perceived loudness, rather by changes in detection and discrimination sensitivity. HighlightsO_LISelf-generation and stimulus intensity interactively shape auditory perception. C_LIO_LISupra-threshold self-generated sounds are perceptually attenuated. C_LIO_LIWhen near-threshold, perceived intensity is enhanced for self-generated sounds. C_LIO_LISelf-generation and intensity modulate perceptual bias, rather than sensitivity. C_LIO_LISurprise-driven attentional mechanisms may underlie these perceptual shifts. C_LI
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 24
- FWCI
- 2.11
- Field percentile
- top 13%
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Causal inference in environmental sound recognition
J. Traer, S. V. Norman-Haignere, J. H. McDermott·CognitionPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2021
- Context effects in pitch discrimination reflect response bias not sensory bias
Coral E. Dirks, Daniel R. Guest, Andrew J. Oxenham·bioRxiv·Jul 3, 2026
- Magnitude estimation reveals Poisson-like noise underlying perception
Cristina Rodríguez-Arribas, Joan López‐Moliner, Daniel Linares·bioRxiv·Sep 2, 2026
- Perceptual sensitivity is explained by optimization for ecological tasks
Mark R. Saddler, Torsten Dau, Josh H. McDermott·bioRxiv·Oct 5, 2026
- A unified framework for perceived magnitude and dicriminability of sensory stimuli
Jingyang Zhou, Lyndon Duong, Eero P. Simoncelli·bioRxiv·Apr 30, 2022
- Loudness and sound category: Their distinct roles in shaping perceptual and physiological responses to soundscapes
Mercede Erfanian, Tin Oberman, … Jian Kang·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2025