Sign in
NeuroscienceNetwork Neuroscience
Peer-reviewed journal article

A Regression Framework for Brain Network Distance Metrics

Chal E. TomlinsoniD, Paul J. LaurientiiD, Robert G. LydayiD, Sean L. SimpsoniD

Abstract

Analyzing brain networks has long been a prominent research topic in neuroimaging. However, statistical methods to detect differences between these networks and relate them to phenotypic traits are still sorely needed. Our previous work developed a novel permutation testing framework to detect differences between two groups. Here we advance that work to allow both assessing differences by continuous phenotypes and controlling for confounding variables. To achieve this, we propose an innovative regression framework to relate distances between brain network features to functions of absolute differences in continuous covariates and indicators of difference for categorical variables. We explore several similarity metrics for comparing distances between connection matrices, and adapt several standard methods for estimation and inference within our framework: Standard F-test, F-test with individual level effects (ILE), Feasible Generalized Least Squares (FGLS), and Permutation. Via simulation studies, we assess all approaches for estimation and inference while comparing them with existing Multivariate Distance Matrix Regression (MDMR) methods. We then illustrate the utility of our framework by analyzing the relationship between fluid intelligence and brain network distances in Human Connectome Project (HCP) data. HighlightsO_LIRelated distances between connection matrices to differences in covariates. C_LIO_LIAdapted methods for estimation and inference in this framework. C_LIO_LIAssessment of methods and distance metrics via simulation. C_LIO_LICompared our methods to existing MDMR methods via simulation. C_LIO_LIAnalysis of the HCP data with the best approach for each distance metric. C_LI

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
15
FWCI
1.45
Field percentile
top 20%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.