Journal of NeuroscienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Retrospective cues mitigate information loss in human cortex during working memory storage
Abstract
Working memory (WM) enables the flexible representation of information over short intervals. It is well-established that WM performance can be enhanced by a retrospective cue presented during storage, yet the neural mechanisms responsible for this benefit are unclear. Here, we tested several explanations for retro-cue benefits by quantifying changes in spatial WM representations reconstructed from alpha-band (8-12 Hz) EEG activity recorded from human participants (both sexes) before and after presentation of a retrospective cue. This allowed us to track cue-related changes in WM representations with high temporal resolution (tens of milliseconds). Participants encoded the locations of two colored discs for subsequent report. During neutral trials an uninformative cue instructed participants to remember the locations of both discs across a blank delay, and we observed a monotonic decrease in the fidelity of reconstructed spatial WM representations with time. During valid trials a 100% reliable cue indicated the color of the disc participants would be probed to report. Critically, valid cues were presented immediately after termination of the encoding display (\"valid early\", or VE trials) or midway through the delay period (\"valid late\" or VL trials). During VE trials the gradual loss of location-specific information observed during neutral trials was eliminated, while during VL trials it was partially reversed. Our findings suggest that retro-cues engage several different mechanisms that together serve to mitigate information loss during WM storage.\n\nSignificance StatementWorking memory (WM) performance can be improved by a cue presented during storage. This effect, termed a retrospective cue benefit, has been used to explore the limitations of attentional prioritization in WM. However, the mechanisms responsible for retrospective cue benefits are unclear. Here we tested several explanations for retrospective cue benefits by examining how they influence WM representations reconstructed from human EEG activity. This approach allowed us to visualize, quantify, and track the effects of retrospective cues with high temporal resolution (on the order of tens of milliseconds). We show that under different circumstances retrospective cues can both eliminate and even partially reverse information loss during WM storage, suggesting that retrospective cue benefits have manifold origins.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 38
- FWCI
- 1.93
- Field percentile
- top 15%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Recovery of Information from Latent Memory Stores Decreases Over Time.
Asal Nouri, Edward F. Ester·Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·May 25, 2019
- Unattended but actively stored: EEG dynamics reveal a dissociation between selective attention and storage in working memory
Eren Günseli, Johannes J. Fahrenfort, … Christian N. L. Olivers·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Sep 18, 2019
- Tracking neural correlates of prioritizing working memory representations through retrospective attentional strengthening
Dongwei Li, Yiqing Hu, … Yan Song·bioRxiv·Aug 26, 2022
- Spatial working memory representations in human cortex are robust to a task-irrelevant interrupting stimulus
Kelvin Vu-Cheung, Edward F. Ester, Thomas C. Sprague·bioRxiv·Sep 16, 2021
- Working memory implements distinct maintenance mechanisms depending on task goals
Johannes J. Fahrenfort, Jonathan van Leeuwen, … Christian N. L. Olivers·bioRxiv·Aug 9, 2017
- The Neural Consequences of Attentional Prioritization of Internal Representations in Visual Working Memory
Muhammet Ikbal Sahan, Andrew D. Sheldon, Bradley R. Postle·Journal of Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Dec 18, 2019