Methods in Ecology and EvolutionGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article
Unbiased population heterozygosity estimates from genome-wide sequence data
Thomas L. SchmidtiD, Moshe E. JasperiD, Andrew Raymond WeeksiD, Ary A. HoffmanniD
Abstract
O_LIHeterozygosity is a metric of genetic variability frequently used to inform the management of threatened taxa. Estimating observed and expected heterozygosities from genome-wide sequence data has become increasingly common, and these estimates are often derived directly from genotypes at single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers. While many SNP markers can provide precise estimates of genetic processes, the results of downstream analysis with these markers may depend heavily on upstream filtering decisions. C_LIO_LIHere we explore the downstream consequences of sample size, rare allele filtering, missing data thresholds and known population structure on estimates of observed and expected heterozygosity using two reduced-representation sequencing datasets, one from the mosquito Aedes aegypti (ddRADseq) and the other from a threatened grasshopper, Keyacris scurra (DArTseq). C_LIO_LIWe show that estimates based on polymorphic markers only (i.e. SNP heterozygosity) are always biased by global sample size (N), with smaller N producing larger estimates. By contrast, results are unbiased by sample size when calculations consider monomorphic as well as polymorphic sequence information (i.e. genome-wide or autosomal heterozygosity). SNP heterozygosity is also biased when differentiated populations are analysed together, while autosomal heterozygosity remains unbiased. We also show that when nucleotide sites with missing genotypes are included, observed and expected heterozygosity estimates diverge in proportion to the amount of missing data permitted at each site. C_LIO_LIWe make three recommendations for estimating genome-wide heterozygosity: (i) autosomal heterozygosity should be reported instead of (or in addition to) SNP heterozygosity; (ii) sites with any missing data should be omitted; (iii) populations should be analysed in independent runs. This should facilitate comparisons within and across studies and between observed and expected measures of heterozygosity. C_LI
- Citations
- 198
- FWCI
- 17.26
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A population-level statistic for assessing Mendelian behavior of genotyping-by-sequencing data from highly duplicated genomes
Lindsay V. Clark, Wittney Mays, … Erik J. Sacks·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 22, 2022
- Accounting for genotype uncertainty in the estimation of allele frequencies in autopolyploids
Paul D Blischak, Laura S Kubatko, Andrea D Wolfe·bioRxiv·Sep 23, 2015
- Unbalanced Sample Size Introduces Spurious Correlations to Genome-wide Heterozygosity Analyses
Li Liu, Richard J. Caselli·Human HeredityPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2019
- High standing diversity masks extreme genetic erosion in a declining snake.
Andrea Vittorio Pozzi, John Benjamin Owens, … Axel Barlow·bioRxiv·Sep 19, 2023
- Inferring heterozygosity from ancient and low coverage genomes
Athanasios Kousathanas, Christoph Leuenberger, … Daniel Wegmann·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2017
- How Array Design Affects SNP Ascertainment Bias
Johannes Geibel, Christian Reimer, … Henner Simianer·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Mar 30, 2021