Sign in
BioinformaticsBMC Bioinformatics
Peer-reviewed journal article

A population-level statistic for assessing Mendelian behavior of genotyping-by-sequencing data from highly duplicated genomes

Lindsay V. ClarkiD, Wittney Mays, Alexander Edward LipkaiD, Erik J. SacksiD

Abstract

BackgroundGiven the economic and environmental importance of allopolyploids and other species with highly duplicated genomes, there is a need for methods to distinguish paralogs, i.e. duplicate sequences within a genome, from Mendelian loci, i.e. single copy sequences that pair at meiosis. The ratio of observed to expected heterozygosity is an effective tool for filtering loci but requires genotyping to be performed first at a high computational cost, whereas counting the number of sequence tags detected per genotype is computationally quick but very ineffective in inbred or polyploid populations. Therefore, new methods are needed for filtering paralogs. ResultsWe introduce a novel statistic, Hind/HE, that uses the probability that two reads sampled from a genotype will belong to different alleles, instead of observed heterozygosity. The expected value of Hind/HE is the same across all loci in a dataset, regardless of read depth or allele frequency. In contrast to methods based on observed heterozygosity, it can be estimated and used for filtering loci prior to genotype calling. In addition to filtering paralogs, it can be used to filter loci with null alleles or high overdispersion, and identify individuals with unexpected ploidy and hybrid status. We demonstrate that the statistic is useful at read depths as low as five to 10, well below the depth needed for accurate genotype calling in polyploid and outcrossing species. ConclusionsOur methodology for estimating Hind/HE across loci and individuals, as well as determining reasonable thresholds for filtering loci, is implemented in polyRAD v1.6, available at https://github.com/lvclark/polyRAD. In large sequencing datasets, we anticipate that the ability to filter markers and identify problematic individuals prior to genotype calling will save researchers considerable computational time.

PDFDOICode

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
17
FWCI
0.73
Field percentile
top 37%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISSchmidt '21Motazedi '19Blischak '17Clark '19Blischak '15Fletcher '22
61% semantic matchGenomics
Thomas L. Schmidt, Moshe E. Jasper, Andrew Raymond Weeks+1 more·Methods in Ecology and Evolution·Jun 12, 2021· 198 citations