bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Inducing lucid dreaming with multisensory stimulation: a preregistered multi-center study
Claudia Picard‐DelandiD, Mahdad Jafarzadeh EsfahaniiD, Leila SalveseniD, Tobi MatzekiD, Ema DemšariD, Tinke van Buijtene, Victoria Libucha, Cosimo Cecconi, Bianca PedreschiiD, Paul ZerriD, Nico AdelhöferiD, Emma PetersiD, Sarah Fiona SchochiD, Giulio BernardiiD, Michelle CarriD, Martin DresleriD
- Citations
- 3
Abstract
Lucid dreaming occurs when one is aware of dreaming while asleep. While lucid dreaming can occur spontaneously, it remains rare. This multi-center study (Netherlands, Italy, Canada) tested a combined induction approach integrating senses-initiated lucid dreaming (SSILD) with targeted lucidity reactivation in a large sample of participants with varying lucid dreaming experience. Sixty participants (33 F; 26.5 {+/-}6.2 years old) completed two morning naps in the sleep laboratory. Participants received pre-sleep SSILD training paired with visual, auditory, and tactile cues that were then reintroduced in REM sleep, with stimulation and sham conditions counterbalanced. Lucidity and cue perception were verified using intentional eye movements from within the dream (signal-verified lucid dream, SVLD). SVLDs occurred in 31 participants (51.7%) across both naps. Subjective lucidity occurred in 63 naps (52.5%), including 40 SVLDs (33.3%) with no difference between stimulation (38.3%) and sham (28.3%) conditions. However, SVLD duration and number of predefined eye movements were higher with sensory cueing. Cues were perceived within sleep in most cued REM periods (71.1%), sometimes acting as lucidity signals (39.1% of stim SVLDs) and occasionally disrupting sleep (23.7% of cued periods). Overall, our combined cognitive-sensory induction method produced relatively high lucid dreaming rates, even in participants who rarely experience them. While cues were sometimes perceived as lucidity signals and may help prolong lucid episodes, our results do not show clear benefits of REM cueing over SSILD training alone. Further refinement of these methods may support clinical applications and deepen insight into consciousness and sensory processing during sleep.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Waking Up in the Dream Lab: A Lab-Based Lucid Dream Induction Paradigm Using Virtual Reality and Sensory Stimulation
Emma Peters, Johanna Heitmann, … Daniel Erlacher·bioRxiv·Mar 26, 2026
- Balancing Lucidity: Muscle and Vestibular Stimulation for Lucid Dream Induction
Emma Peters, Xinlin Wang, … Daniel Erlacher·bioRxiv·Mar 13, 2026
- Juggling the Limits of Lucidity: Searching for Cognitive Constraints in Dream Motor Practice
Emma Peters, Kathrin Fischer, Daniel Erlacher·bioRxiv·Feb 12, 2025
- EEG Microstates reveal distinct network dynamics in lucid and non-lucid REM sleep
Xinlin Wang, Emma Peters, … Daniel Erlacher·Consciousness and CognitionPeer-reviewed·Apr 13, 2026
- A Comparative Study of Muscular, Vestibular, and Haptic Stimulation on Dream Incorporation
Emma Peters, Jakob Pöhlmann, … Daniel Erlacher·bioRxiv·Dec 5, 2024
- Electrophysiological correlates of lucid dreaming: sensor and source level signatures
Çağatay Demirel, Jarrod Gott, … Martin Dresler·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Apr 21, 2025