bioRxivMicrobiology
Repeatability and reproducibility assessment in a large-scale population-based microbiota study: case study on human milk microbiota
Abstract
BackgroundQuality control including assessment of batch variabilities and confirmation of repeatability and reproducibility are integral component of high throughput omics studies including microbiome research. Batch effects can mask true biological results and/or result in irreproducible conclusions and interpretations. Low biomass samples in microbiome research are prone to reagent contamination; yet, quality control procedures for low biomass samples in large-scale microbiome studies are not well established. ResultsIn this study we have proposed a framework for an in-depth step-by-step approach to address this gap. The framework consists of three independent stages: 1) verification of sequencing accuracy by assessing technical repeatability and reproducibility of the results using mock communities and biological controls; 2) contaminant removal and batch variability correction by applying a two-tier strategy using statistical algorithms (e.g. decontam) followed by comparison of the data structure between batches; and 3) corroborating the repeatability and reproducibility of microbiome composition and downstream statistical analysis. Using this approach on the milk microbiota data from the CHILD Cohort generated in two batches (extracted and sequenced in 2016 and 2019), we were able to identify potential reagent contaminants that were missed with standard algorithms, and substantially reduce contaminant-induced batch variability. Additionally, we confirmed the repeatability and reproducibility of our reslults in each batch before merging them for downstream analysis. ConclusionThis study provides important insight to advance quality control efforts in low biomass microbiome research. Within-study quality control that takes advantage of the data structure (i.e. differential prevalence of contaminants between batches) would enhance the overall reliability and reproducibility of research in this field.
- organism: human
- assay: metagenomics
- research focus: batch correction / integration
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Measures of reproducibility in sampling and laboratory processing methods in high-throughput microbiome analysis
Patricia Vera-Wolf, Juan P. Cárdenas, … Zachary S Apte·bioRxiv·May 15, 2018
- The impact of kit, environment and sampling contamination on the observed microbiome of bovine milk
C. J. Dean, Y. Deng, … N. Noyes·bioRxiv·Nov 7, 2023
- Quantifying and understanding well-to-well contamination in microbiome research
Jeremiah J. Minich, Jon G. Sanders, … Rob D. Knight·mSystemsPeer-reviewed·Jun 24, 2019
- Reagent contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses
Susannah Salter, Michael J Cox, … Alan W Walker·bioRxiv·Jul 16, 2014
- High reproducibility demonstrated in a direct-to-consumer microbiome testing workflow under real-world conditions using fecal reference material
Julian M Trachsel, Hannah Sturgeon, … Kimberley V Sukhum·bioRxiv·Nov 5, 2026
- A comprehensive quality control pipeline in human microbiome research for large population studies
Ruolin Li, Joost Verlouw, … Carolina Medina‐Gómez·bioRxiv·Jan 20, 2025