bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Sport expertise and motor imagery abilities shape sensorimotor rhythm modulations during visualisation tasks: Implications for neurofeedback-based cognitive training in athletes
Margaux IzaciD, Emeline PierrieauiD, E. Rossignol, Natalia Grechukhin, Elina Coudroy, Léa PilletteiD, Bernard N’KaouaiD, Camille JeunetiD
Abstract
Kinaesthetic motor imagery (kMI) is widely used in sport to enhance motor performance by engaging cortical sensorimotor networks. Neurofeedback may further support kMI, but the optimal neural target to reinforce remains unclear. Maximal sensorimotor event-related desynchronisation (SMR-ERD) represents a relevant target as it may index sensorimotor cortex engagement, yet sport expertise has been associated with reduced SMR-ERD, potentially reflecting neural efficiency. The optimal neurofeedback target may therefore depend on sport expertise, movement expertise, and individual kMI ability. This study examined how these factors influence sensorimotor activity during kMI. We compared 17 basketball players (Experts) and 16 individuals without formal basketball training (Novices). kMI ability and frequency of use were assessed using questionnaires, while SMR-ERD was quantified using electroencephalography (EEG) during kMI. Participants imagined either a basketball-specific movement (Free throw), for which only Experts had extensive experience, or a generic movement (Box lifting), familiar to both groups. Experts reported greater kMI ability and more frequent kMI use than Novices. Only Experts exhibited significant and sustained SMR-ERD during kMI. Moreover, SMR-ERD was stronger in Experts than Novices specifically during Free throw kMI, corresponding to their movement of expertise. Nonetheless, within the Expert group, higher kMI ability was associated with reduced SMR-ERD. These findings suggest that sport expertise initially enhances voluntary recruitment of sensorimotor networks during kMI, whereas greater kMI ability may subsequently promote neural efficiency, resulting in reduced overall sensorimotor cortical activation. These results highlight the need to tailor kMI-based neurofeedback training to users' sport expertise and kMI ability levels.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: cell type annotation
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Enhancement of motor performance by a training method combining motor imagery and neurofeedback
Chosei Sha, Kaori Tamura, Tsuyoshi Okamoto·bioRxiv·Apr 19, 2020
- Gymnasts' ability to modulate bioelectric sensorimotor rhythms during kinesthetic motor imagery of sports non-specific movements
Hirotaka Sugino, Junichi Ushiyama·Frontiers in Sports and Active LivingPeer-reviewed·Nov 4, 2021
- Motor Imagery EEG Neurofeedback Skill Acquisition in the Context of Declarative Interference and Sleep
Mareike Daeglau, Catharina Zich, … Cornelia Kranczioch·bioRxiv·Dec 11, 2020
- Enhanced human sensorimotor integration via self-modulation of the somatosensory activity
Seitaro Iwama, Takamasa Ueno, … Junichi Ushiba·iSciencePeer-reviewed·Mar 3, 2025
- A BCI-based vibrotactile neurofeedback training improves motor cortical excitability during motor imagery
Nikita Grigorev, Andrey Savosenkov, … Susanna Gordleeva·IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2021
- Modulatory Effects of the Motor Imagery and Jendrassik Maneuver upon the Forearm H-Reflex and Electroencephalographic Activity
Nadezhda M Starodubtseva, Marina Morozova, Mikhail Lebedev·bioRxiv·Nov 25, 2025