bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
Sparse input neural networks to differentiate 32 primary cancer types based on somatic point mutations
Abstract
This paper aims to differentiate cancer types from primary tumour samples based on somatic point mutations (SPM). Primary cancer site identification is necessary to perform site-specific and potentially targeted treatment. Current methods like histopathology/lab-tests cannot accurately determine cancers origin, which results in empirical patient treatment and poor survival rates. The availability of large deoxyribonucleic-acid sequencing datasets has allowed scientists to examine the ability of SPM to classify primary cancer sites. These datasets are highly sparse since most genes will not be mutated, have low signal-to-noise ratio and are imbalanced since rare cancers have less samples. To overcome these limitations a sparse-input neural network (spinn) is suggested that projects the input data in a lower dimensional space, where the more informative genes are used for learning. To train and evaluate spinn, an extensive dataset was collected from the cancer genome atlas containing 7624 samples spanning 32 cancer types. Different sampling strategies were performed to balance the dataset but have not benefited the classifiers performance except for removing Tomek-links. This is probably due to high amount of class overlapping. Spinn consistently outperformed algorithms like extreme gradient-boosting, deep neural networks and support-vector-machines, achieving an accuracy up to 73% on independent testing data.
- assay: whole-exome sequencing
- research focus: clustering
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: variant calling
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- approach: deep learning
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A benchmarking of deep neural network models for cancer subtyping using single point mutations
P. Parhami, M. Fateh, … H. Alinejad-Rokny·bioRxiv·Jul 24, 2022
- Deep Discriminative Fine-Tuning for Cancer TypeClassification
A. Harley·bioRxiv·Nov 13, 2019
- Cancer subtype identification using somatic mutation data
Marieke L. Kuijjer, Joseph Nathaniel Paulson, … John F Quackenbush·British Journal of CancerPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2018
- Mutational Analysis and Deep Learning Classification of Uterine and Cervical Cancers
Paul Gomez·Journal of Artificial Intelligence for Medical SciencesPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2022
- Cancer type classification in liquid biopsies based on sparse mutational profiles enabled through data augmentation and integration
Alexandra Danyi, Myrthe Jager, Jeroen de Ridder·LifePeer-reviewed·Dec 21, 2021
- CancerSiamese: one-shot learning for predicting primary and metastatic tumor types unseen during model training
Milad Mostav, Yu‐Chiao Chiu, … Yufei Huang·bioRxiv·Sep 7, 2020