Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis OpenBiochemistryPeer-reviewed journal article
Definitive benchmarking of DDA and DIA for host cell protein analysis on the Orbitrap Astral in a regulatory-aligned framework
Abstract
Host cell proteins (HCPs) are critical quality attributes in biotherapeutics and require accurate, protein-resolved quantification beyond the coverage limits of immunoassays. The Orbitrap Astral mass spectrometer was evaluated for label-free HCP analysis through a direct comparison of data-dependent acquisition (DDA, Top80) and data-independent acquisition (DIA, 4 m/z windows). Deterministic protein inference was implemented to ensure invariant protein grouping across datasets and software versions. Quantification was anchored using a whole-proteome stable isotope-labeled HCP standard, with identification error controlled through empirical false discovery proportion estimation. Both acquisition modes quantified total HCP content with high linearity (R2 > 0.99) and total error within {+/-}30% acceptance limits across a seven-point spike-in series. DIA achieved greater analytical depth, identifying 45% more proteins and 68% more peptides than DDA, with substantially reduced missingness. Protein-level fold-change behavior was evaluated using hierarchical Bayesian regression, with slopes centered near unity for DIA and systematic compression observed for DDA. Abundance-stratified resampling analysis demonstrated trueness and precision across the dynamic range and defined lower limits of quantification of approximately 0.6 ppm for DIA and 1.6 ppm for DDA. Both acquisition strategies accurately report global HCP content, while DIA provides improved coverage, fold-change fidelity, and sensitivity for low-abundance impurities. This study demonstrates that untargeted MS-based HCP measurements can be analytically qualified for use in regulated biopharmaceutical settings.
- Citations
- 6
- FWCI
- 7.63
- Field percentile
- top 3%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- High-Speed Mass Spectrometers diminish the difference between Data-Dependent and Data-Independent Acquisition Proteomics
Naomi O'Sullivan, Florian P Bayer, … Bernhard Küster·bioRxiv·May 28, 2026
- diaPASEF Enables High-throughput Proteomic Analysis of Host Cell Proteins for Biopharmaceutical Process Development
T. Tsukidate, A. Q. Stiving, … X. Li·bioRxiv·Feb 21, 2024
- Comparative analysis of MS/MS search algorithms in label-free shotgun proteomics for monitoring host-cell proteins using trapped ion mobility and ddaPASEF
Somar Khalil, Michel Plisnier·Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis OpenPeer-reviewed·Jul 22, 2025
- Extensive and accurate benchmarking of DIA acquisition methods and software tools using a complex proteomic standard
Clarisse Gotti, Florence Roux‐Dalvai, … Arnaud Droit·Journal of Proteome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Sep 2, 2021
- Isobaric Tagging and Data Independent Acquisition as Complementary Strategies for Proteome Profiling on an Orbitrap Astral Mass Spectrometer
Xinyue Liu, Shane L. Dawson, … João A. Paulo·Journal of Proteome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Feb 12, 2025
- Prospective ICH Q2(R2)-aligned total-error validation of label-free untargeted proteomics for host cell protein quantification in biotherapeutics
Somar Khalil, Jean‐François Dierick, … Michel Plisnier·ProteomesPeer-reviewed·Apr 23, 2026