PLoS ONEBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Small hand-designed convolutional neural networks outperform transfer learning in automated cell shape detection in confluent tissues
Louis Combe, M. DurandeiD, Hélène Delanoë‐AyariiD, Olivier Cochet‐EscartiniD
Abstract
Mechanical cues such as stresses and strains are now recognized as essential regulators in many biological processes such as cell division, gene expression or morphogenesis. Studying the interplay between these mechanical cues and biological responses requires experimental tools to measure these cues. In the context of large scale tissues, this can be achieved by segmenting individual cells to extract their shapes and deformations which in turn inform on their mechanical environment. Historically, this has been done by segmentation methods which are well known to be time consuming and error prone. In this context however, one doesnt necessarily require a cell-level description and a coarse grained approach can be more efficient while using tools different than segmentation. The advent of machine learning and deep neural networks has revolutionized the field of image analysis in recent years, including in biomedical research. With the democratization of these techniques, more and more researchers are trying to apply them to their own biological systems. In this paper, we tackle a problem of cell shape measurement thanks to a large annotated dataset. We develop simple CNNs which we thoroughly optimize in terms of architecture and complexity to question construction rules usually applied. We find that increasing the complexity of the networks rapidly no longer yields improvements in performance and that the number of kernels in each convolutional layer is the most important parameter to achieve good results. In addition, we compare our step-by-step approach with transfer learning and find that our simple, optimized CNNs give better predictions, are faster in training and analysis and dont require more technical knowledge to be implemented. Overall, we offer a rational roadmap to develop optimized models and argue that we should limit the complexity of such models. We conclude by illustrating this strategy on a similar problem and dataset.
- assay: imaging
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: clustering
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: dimensionality reduction
- approach: deep learning
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 7
- FWCI
- 0.85
- Field percentile
- top 33%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Cellular structure image classification with small targeted training samples
Dali Wang, Zheng Lu, … Zhirong Bao·IEEE AccessPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2019
- Transfer learning framework for cell segmentation with incorporation of geometric features
Yinuo Jin, Alexandre Toberoff, Elham Azizi·bioRxiv·Feb 28, 2021
- Transfer learning with deep convolutional neural networks for classifying cellular morphological changes
Alexander Kensert, Philip John Harrison, Ola Spjuth·SLAS DISCOVERYPeer-reviewed·Jan 14, 2019
- Predicting the future direction of cell movement with convolutional neural networks
Shori Nishimoto, Yuta Tokuoka, … Akira Funahashi·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Sep 4, 2019
- Unsupervised deep learning method for cell segmentation
- Combining Deep Learning and Active Contours Opens The Way to Robust, Automated Analysis of Brain Cytoarchitectonics
Konstantin Thierbach, Pierre‐Louis Bazin, … Nico Scherf·Lecture notes in computer sciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2018