Molecular Biology and EvolutionBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
The carbon footprint of bioinformatics
Jason GrealeyiD, Loïc LannelongueiD, Woei‐Yuh Saw, Jonathan MarteniD, Guillaume MériciD, Sergio Ruiz CarmonaiD, Michael InouyeiD
Abstract
Bioinformatic research relies on large-scale computational infrastructures which have a non-zero carbon footprint. So far, no study has quantified the environmental costs of bioinformatic tools and commonly run analyses. In this study, we estimate the bioinformatic carbon footprint (in kilograms of CO2 equivalent units, kgCO2e) using the freely available Green Algorithms calculator (www.green-algorithms.org). We assess (i) bioinformatic approaches in genome-wide association studies (GWAS), RNA sequencing, genome assembly, metagenomics, phylogenetics and molecular simulations, as well as (ii) computation strategies, such as parallelisation, CPU (central processing unit) vs GPU (graphics processing unit), cloud vs. local computing infrastructure and geography. In particular, for GWAS, we found that biobank-scale analyses emitted substantial kgCO2e and simple software upgrades could make GWAS greener, e.g. upgrading from BOLT-LMM v1 to v2.3 reduced carbon footprint by 73%. Switching from the average data centre to a more efficient data centres can reduce carbon footprint by ~34%. Memory over-allocation can be a substantial contributor to an algorithms carbon footprint. The use of faster processors or greater parallelisation reduces run time but can lead to, sometimes substantially, greater carbon footprint. Finally, we provide guidance on how researchers can reduce power consumption and minimise kgCO2e. Overall, this work elucidates the carbon footprint of common analyses in bioinformatics and provides solutions which empower a move toward greener research.
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- assay: metagenomics
- assay: multiome
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 115
- FWCI
- 6.64
- Field percentile
- top 2%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- An open-source tool to assess the carbon footprint of research
J. Mariette, O. Blanchard, … T. Ben Ari·bioRxiv·Jan 14, 2021
- Purchases dominate the carbon footprint of research laboratories
M. De Paepe, L. Jeanneau, … A. Estevez-Torres·bioRxiv·Apr 4, 2023
- A large-scale analysis of bioinformatics code on GitHub
Pamela H. Russell, Rachel L. Johnson, … Nichole E. Carlson·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Oct 31, 2018
- Setting a trajectory for CO2 emission reduction in academic research: a case study of a French biophysics laboratory
C. Giuglaris, J. de Seze·bioRxiv·Nov 30, 2023
- WillCO2st: leveraging freely available real-time carbon forecasting for research emissions reporting
William V. Smith, Stefan R. Pulver·PLOS Sustainability and TransformationPeer-reviewed·Jul 30, 2026
- Doctoral Students as Carbon Accountants: Calculating Carbon Costs of a PhD in Neuroscience
William V. Smith, Aimee Bebbington, … Stefan R. Pulver·bioRxiv·Jan 20, 2025