Mitochondrial architecture rearrangements produce asymmetrical nonadaptive mutational pressures that subvert the phylogenetic reconstruction in Isopoda
D. Zhang, H. Zou, C.-J. Hua, W.-X. Li, S. Mahboob, K. A. Al-Ghanim, F. Al-Misned, I. Jakovlic, G.-T. Wang
Abstract
The phylogeny of Isopoda, a speciose order of crustaceans, remains unresolved, with different datasets often producing starkly incongruent phylogenetic hypotheses. We hypothesised that extreme diversity in their life histories might be causing compositional heterogeneity/heterotachy in their mitochondrial genomes, and compromising the phylogenetic reconstruction. We tested the effects of different datasets (mitochondrial, nuclear, nucleotides, amino acids, concatenated genes, individual genes, gene orders), phylogenetic algorithms (assuming data homogeneity, heterogeneity, and heterotachy), and partitioning; and found that almost all of them produced unique topologies. As we also found that mitogenomes of Asellota and two Cymothoida families (Cymothoidae and Corallanidae) possess inversed base (GC) skew patterns in comparison to other isopods, we concluded that inverted skews cause long-branch attraction phylogenetic artefacts between these taxa. These asymmetrical skews are most likely driven by multiple independent inversions of origin of replication (i.e., nonadaptive mutational pressures). Although the PhyloBayes CAT-GTR algorithm managed to attenuate some of these artefacts (and outperform partitioning), mitochondrial data have limited applicability for reconstructing the phylogeny of Isopoda. Regardless of this, our analyses allowed us to propose solutions to some unresolved phylogenetic debates, and support Asellota are the most likely candidate for the basal isopod branch. As our findings show that architectural rearrangements can produce major compositional biases even on short evolutionary timescales, the implications are that proving the suitability of data via composition skew analyses should be a prerequisite for every study that aims to use mitochondrial data for phylogenetic reconstruction, even among closely related taxa.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Evolutionary history of inversions in the direction of architecture-driven mutational pressures in crustacean mitochondrial genomes
D. Zhang, H. Zou, … I. Jakovlic·bioRxiv·May 9, 2020
- Using mitochondrial genomes to infer phylogenetic relationships among the oldest extant winged insects (Palaeoptera)
Sereina Rutschmann, Ping Chen, … Michael T. Monaghan·bioRxiv·Aug 22, 2017
- Long read sequencing reveals atypical mitochondrial genome structure in a New Zealand marine isopod
William S. Pearman, Sarah J. Wells, … Nikki E. Freed·Royal Society Open SciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2022
- Extreme mito-nuclear discordance within Anthozoa, with notes on unique properties of their mitochondrial genomes
A. M. Quattrini, K. Snyder, … C. S. McFadden·bioRxiv·Oct 18, 2022
- Phylogenomics supports a single origin of terrestriality in Isopods.
Jessica Thomas·Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2024
- Discordance between phylogenomic datasets in aphids: who is telling the truth?
Emmanuelle Jousselin, Armelle Cœur d’Acier, … Alejandro Manzano-Marín·Zoological Journal of the Linnean SocietyPeer-reviewed·Jul 12, 2024