Using relative brain size to better understand trophic interactions and phenotypic plasticity of invasive lionfish (Pterois volitans)

Abstract

Predator-prey dynamics provide critical insight into overall coral reef health. It has been shown that predator-prey relationships link the relative brain size of predators to their prey. Predation pressure forces prey to use decision-making skills that require higher cognition by inspecting and identifying predators and then adjusting their behavior to achieve the highest chance for survival. However, the predation pressure that prey face outweighs the pressure predators face to find prey, resulting in prey having larger relative brain sizes than their predators. There is little data on the relative brain size of fishes with few natural predators such as Pterois volitans. This study compared the brain mass to body mass ratio of Pterois volitans, which have very few natural predators and thus very little predation pressure, to the brain mass to body mass ratio of their prey, possible predators, competitors, and taxonomically similar fish. Lionfish had a significantly smaller relative brain size than their predators, prey, and competitors, but was not significantly smaller than taxonomically similar fish. These results demonstrate that the morphological anti-predator adaptation of venomous spines causes little predation pressure. Thus, lionfish do not use the same cognitive skills as other prey or predators and, in turn, have smaller relative brain sizes.