Frontiers in Human NeuroscienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Signal-space projection suppresses the tACS artifact in EEG recordings
Johannes VosskuhliD, Tuomas P. MutaneniD, Toralf NeulingiD, Risto Juhani IlmoniemiiD, Christoph Siegfried HerrmanniD
Abstract
1.BackgroundTo probe the functional role of brain oscillations, transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) has proven to be a useful neuroscientific tool. Because of the huge tACS-caused artifact in electroencephalography (EEG) signals, tACS-EEG studies have been mostly limited to compare brain activity between recordings before and after concurrent tACS. Critically, attempts to suppress the artifact in the data cannot assure that the entire artifact is removed while brain activity is preserved. The current study aims to evaluate the feasibility of specific artifact correction techniques to clean tACS-contaminated EEG data. New MethodIn the first experiment, we used a phantom head to have full control over the signal to be analyzed. Driving pre-recorded human brain-oscillation signals through a dipolar current source within the phantom, we simultaneously applied tACS and compared the performance of different artifact-correction techniques: sine subtraction, template subtraction, and signal-space projection (SSP). In the second experiment, we combined tACS and EEG on a human subject to validate the best-performing data-correction approach. ResultsThe tACS artifact was highly attenuated by SSP in the phantom and the human EEG; thus, we were able to recover the amplitude and phase of the oscillatory activity. In the human experiment, event-related desynchronization could be restored after correcting the artifact. Comparison with existing methodsThe best results were achieved with SSP, which outperformed sine subtraction and template subtraction. ConclusionsOur results demonstrate the feasibility of SSP by applying it to human tACS-EEG data.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 24
- FWCI
- 1.35
- Field percentile
- top 21%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Stimulation Artifact Source Separation (SASS) for assessing electric brain oscillations during transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)
David Haslacher, Khaled Nasr, … Surjo Raphael Soekadar·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jan 9, 2021
- A need for time-varying models to suppress artefacts of tACS in the M/EEG
Nicholas Simon Bland·bioRxiv·Jun 14, 2021
- Facilitated event-related power-modulations during transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) revealed by concurrent tACS-MEG
Florian H. Kasten, Burkhard Maeß, Christoph Siegfried Herrmann·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2018
- In-vivo phase-dependent enhancement and suppression of brain oscillations by transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)
David Haslacher, Asmita Narang, … Surjo Raphael Soekadar·bioRxiv·Feb 28, 2022
- Characterizing Low-Frequency Artifacts During Transcranial Temporal Interference Stimulation (tTIS)
Jill von Conta, Florian H. Kasten, … Christoph Siegfried Herrmann·Neuroimage ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jun 21, 2022
- An artifact-robust framework for measuring tCS effects during stimulation
Nima Noury, Fabio Damiani, Markus Siegel·bioRxiv·Oct 31, 2025