Journal of Neural EngineeringNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
NeurostimML: A machine learning model for predicting neurostimulation-induced tissue damage
Yi LiiD, Rebecca Anne FrederickiD, Daniel George, Stuart F. CoganiD, Joseph Jewell PancrazioiD, Leonidas G. BlerisiD, Ana Guadalupe Hernandez-ReynosoiD
Abstract
ObjectiveThe safe delivery of electrical current to neural tissue depends on many factors, yet previous methods for predicting tissue damage rely on only a few stimulation parameters. Here, we report the development of a machine learning approach that could lead to a more reliable method for predicting electrical stimulation-induced tissue damage by incorporating additional stimulation parameters. ApproachA literature search was conducted to build an initial database of tissue response information after electrical stimulation, categorized as either damaging or non-damaging. Subsequently, we used ordinal encoding and random forest for feature selection, and investigated four machine learning models for classification: Logistic Regression, K-nearest Neighbor, Random Forest, and Multilayer Perceptron. Finally, we compared the results of these models against the accuracy of the Shannon equation. Main ResultsWe compiled a database with 387 unique stimulation parameter combinations collected from 58 independent studies conducted over a period of 47 years, with 195 (51%) categorized as non-damaging and 190 (49%) categorized as damaging. The features selected for building our model with a Random Forest algorithm were: waveform shape, geometric surface area, pulse width, frequency, pulse amplitude, charge per phase, charge density, current density, duty cycle, daily stimulation duration, daily number of pulses delivered, and daily accumulated charge. The Shannon equation yielded an accuracy of 63.9% using a k value of 1.79. In contrast, the Random Forest algorithm was able to robustly predict whether a set of stimulation parameters was classified as damaging or non-damaging with an accuracy of 88.3%. SignificanceThis novel Random Forest model can facilitate more informed decision making in the selection of neuromodulation parameters for both research studies and clinical practice. This study represents the first approach to use machine learning in the prediction of stimulation-induced neural tissue damage, and lays the groundwork for neurostimulation driven by machine learning models.
- Citations
- 7
- FWCI
- 1.22
- Field percentile
- top 23%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- External Validation of Machine Learning and EEG for Continuous Pain Intensity Prediction in Healthy Individuals
Tyler Mari, Jessica Henderson, … Nicholas B. Fallon·bioRxiv·Nov 9, 2023
- Predictive Modeling of Evoked Intracranial EEG Response to Medial Temporal Lobe Stimulation in Patients with Epilepsy
Gagan Acharya, Kathryn A. Davis, Erfan Nozari·Communications BiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 28, 2024
- Biophysical modeling of the electric field magnitude and distribution induced by electrical stimulation with intracerebral electrodes
Fabiola Alonso, Borja Mercadal, … Julien Modolo·Biomedical Physics & Engineering ExpressPeer-reviewed·May 10, 2023
- One-Shot Random Forest Model Calibration for Hand Gesture Decoding
Xinyu Jiang, Chenfei Ma, Kianoush Nazarpour·Journal of Neural EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Dec 20, 2023
- Comparison of Machine Learning Surrogate Models for Prediction of Single-Fiber Activation in Deep Brain Stimulation
Jorge Alberto, Benjamin Norbom, … Erin E. Patrick·Deep Brain StimulationPeer-reviewed·Sep 7, 2026
- Influence of neck tissue conductivities on the phrenic nerve activation threshold during non-invasive electrical stimulation
Laureen Wegert, Luca Di Rienzo, … Jens Haueisen·Current Directions in Biomedical EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2025