Comparison of Machine Learning Surrogate Models for Prediction of Single-Fiber Activation in Deep Brain Stimulation
Jorge AlbertoiD, Benjamin NorbomiD, Justin E. GolabekiD, Joshua WongiD, Matthew A. SchieferiD, Erin E. PatrickiD
Abstract
Machine-learning surrogate models are positioned to help optimize deep brain stimulation (DBS) usage by predicting neural activation in response to electrical stimulation, while minimizing tradeoffs between computational expense and accuracy. Previous work has developed high accuracy artificial neural network (ANN) and convolutional neural network (CNN) surrogate models that predict activation of individual, myelinated axons, to extracellular electrical stimulation for subsets of DBS programming configurations. Moreover, more traditional machine learning methods including extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) have been used effectively for peripheral-nerve single-fiber activation predictions. We build upon the previous work and compare ANN, CNN and XGBoost methods to a much expanded set of electrode programming configurations including: monopolar, bipolar, tripolar, quadrupolar, multiple monopolar, and multiple cases of directional leads. Training used datasets generated from a finite-element model of an implanted DBS lead together with multi-compartment cable models of synthetically generated axons. We evaluated the machine learning predictors using white matter pathways derived from group-averaged connectome data within a patient-specific tissue conductivity field, comparing both predicted stimulus activation thresholds and pathway recruitment across a clinically relevant range of stimulus amplitudes and pulse widths. Our ANN and CNN models successfully predicted neural fiber activation for almost all electrode configurations with low error, expanding the scope of our previous predictor model. Results also showed key limitations of XGBoost models and superior performance of CNNs for more complex electrostatic fields of the directional leads.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 33th percentile
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Impact of Axon Model Complexity on Deep Brain Stimulation: A Comparative Analysis of MRG and Cohen Double-Cable Models
Mohadeseh Nadimi, Anne Rijpma, … Saman Vinke·bioRxiv·Aug 27, 2026
- A Unified Computational Framework for Deep Brain Stimulation at the Cellular and Network Levels
David Crompton, Luka Milosevic, Milad Lankarany·bioRxiv·Jul 16, 2026
- Using a Deep Learning Approach for Model-based Control of Deep Brain Stimulation
Srikar Saradhi, Yupeng Tian, … Milad Lankarany·bioRxiv·Oct 29, 2024
- Combining biophysical models and machine learning to optimize implant geometry and stimulation protocol for intraneural electrodes
S. Romeni, E. Losanno, … S. Micera·bioRxiv·Feb 24, 2023
- FastField: An Open-Source Toolbox for Efficient Approximation of Deep Brain Stimulation Electric Fields
Mehri Baniasadi, Daniele Proverbio, … Andreas Husch·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Sep 2, 2020
- ApproXON: Heuristic Approximation to the E-Field-Threshold for Deep Brain Stimulation Volume-of-Tissue-Activated Estimation
Daniele Proverbio, Andreas Husch·bioRxiv·Dec 3, 2019