bioRxivBioengineering
Children with Cerebral Palsy Return to Baseline Community Arm Movement after Constraint Induced Movement Therapy
B. M. Goodwin, E. K. Sabelhaus, Y.-C. Pan, K. F. Bjornson, K. L. D. Pham, W. O. Walker, K. M. Steele
Abstract
ImportanceConstraint Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) is a common treatment for children with unilateral cerebral palsy (CP). While clinic-based assessments have demonstrated improvements in arm function after CIMT, quantifying if these changes are translated and sustained outside of a clinic setting remains unclear.\n\nObjectiveAccelerometers were used to quantify arm movement for children with CP one week before, during, and 4+ weeks after CIMT and compared to typically-developing (TD) peers.\n\nDesignObservational during CIMT\n\nSettingClinical assessments and treatment occurred in a tertiary hospital and accelerometry data were collected in the community\n\nParticipants7 children with CP (5m/2f, 7.4 {+/-} 1.2 yrs) and 7 TD peers (2m/5f, 7.0 {+/-} 2.3 yrs)\n\nIntervention30-hour CIMT protocol\n\nOutcomes and MeasuresThe use ratio, magnitude ratio, and bilateral magnitude were calculated from the accelerometry data. Clinical measures were evaluated before and after CIMT and surveys were used to assess the feasibility of using accelerometers.\n\nResultsBefore CIMT, children with CP used their paretic arm less than their TD peers. During therapy, their frequency and magnitude of paretic arm use increased in the clinic and in daily life. After therapy, although clinical scores improved, children reverted to baseline accelerometry values. Additionally, children and parents in both cohorts had positive perceptions of wearing accelerometers.\n\nConclusions and RelevanceThe lack of sustained improved accelerometry metrics following CIMT suggest therapy gains did not translate to increased movement outside the clinic. Additional therapy may be needed to help the transfer of skills to the community setting.\n\nWhat this Article AddsThis study compares the movement of children with CP undergoing CIMT in the community setting with their typically developing peers. Additional interventions may be needed in combination with or following CIMT to sustain the benefits of the therapy outside of the clinic.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Constraint Induced Movement Therapy Confers only a Transient Behavioral Benefit but Enduring Functional Circuit-Level Changes after Experimental TBI.
Afshin Paydar, Laila N. Khorasani, Neil G. Harris·bioRxiv·Aug 2, 2024
- Modeling the assessment of the upper limb motor function impairment in children with cerebral palsy using sEMG and IMU sensors
S. Raouafi, M. Raison, S. Achiche·bioRxiv·Aug 28, 2019
- Upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: constraint versus intensive training. A longitudinal case-control study correlating motor performance with fMRI data
S. Bellaiche, Danielle Ibarolla, … Jacques Luauté·bioRxiv·Dec 22, 2022
- Proximal arm non-use optimises movement when the shoulder is weak: consequences for stroke patients
Germain Valentin Faity, Denis Mottet, … Jérôme Froger·bioRxiv·Oct 26, 2020
- A robot-based gait training therapy for pediatric population with Cerebral Palsy: goal setting, proposal and preliminary clinical implementation
C. Bayon, T. Martin-Lorenzo, … E. Rocon·bioRxiv·Feb 4, 2018
- Physical activity in children and adolescents with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: A cross-sectional case-controlled study
Rachel A. Kennedy, Kate Carroll, … Jennifer L. McGinley·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Jun 12, 2019