bioRxivScientific Communication & EducationPreprint
P-values and confidence intervals: not fit for purpose?
Abstract
DeclarationsCompeting interests: All authors have completed theunified competing interest form and declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years, no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.\n\nThe lead author (the manuscripts guarantor) affirms that the manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported; that no important aspects of the study have been omitted.\n\nEthical approval: not required\n\nDetails of funding: Not applicable\n\nStatement of independence of researchers from funders: Not applicable\n\nPatient involvement statement. Not applicable.\n\nData sharing statement: Not applicable.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Combating the scientific decline effect with confidence (intervals)
David M Groppe·bioRxiv·Dec 10, 2015
- Combining Dependent P-values with an Empirical Adaptation of Brown’s Method
William Poole, David L. Gibbs, … Theo Knijnenburg·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 29, 2016
- PlotsOfDifferences - a web app for the quantitative comparison of unpaired data
J. Goedhart·bioRxiv·Mar 17, 2019
- The Reproducibility Of Research And The Misinterpretation Of P Values
D. Colquhoun·bioRxiv·Oct 25, 2017
- How prior and p-value heuristics are used when interpreting data
E. Hermer, A. A. Irwin, … R. Dakin·bioRxiv·Sep 3, 2023
- A mathematical framework for statistical decision confidence
Balázs Hangya, Joshua I. Sanders, Adam Kepecs·Neural ComputationPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2016