Delay-period activity in frontal, parietal, and occipital cortex tracks different attractor dynamics in visual working memory
Qing YuiD, Matthew F. PanichelloiD, Ying CaiiD, Bradley R. PostleiD, Timothy J. BuschmaniD
Abstract
One important neural hallmark of working memory is persistent elevated delay-period activity in frontal and parietal cortex. In human fMRI, delay-period BOLD activity in frontal and parietal cortex increases monotonically with memory load and asymptotes at an individuals capacity. Previous work has demonstrated that frontal and parietal delay-period activity correlates with the decline in behavioral memory precision observed with increasing memory load. However, because memory precision can be influenced by a variety of factors, it remains unclear what cognitive processes underlie persistent activity in frontal and parietal cortex. Recent psychophysical work has shown that attractor dynamics bias memory representations toward a few stable representations and reduce the effects of internal noise. From this perspective, imprecision in memory results from both drift towards stable attractor states and random diffusion. Here we asked whether delay-period BOLD activity in frontal and parietal cortex might be explained, in part, by these attractor dynamics. We analyzed data from an existing experiment in which subjects performed delayed recall for line orientation, at different loads, during fMRI scanning. We modeled subjects behavior using a discrete attractor model, and calculated within-subject correlation between frontal and parietal delay-period activity and estimated sources of memory error (drift and diffusion). We found that although increases in frontal and parietal activity were associated with increases in both diffusion and drift, diffusion explained the most variance in frontal and parietal delay-period activity. In comparison, a subsequent whole-brain regression analysis showed that drift rather than diffusion explained the most variance in delay-period activity in lateral occipital cortex. These results provide a new interpretation for the function of frontal, parietal, and occipital delay-period activity in working memory.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 34
- FWCI
- 2.15
- Field percentile
- top 13%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Neural mechanisms underlying the precision of visual working memory
Yijie Zhao, Shu‐Guang Kuai, … Yixuan Ku·NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Dec 5, 2019
- Behavioral prioritization enhances working memory precision and neural population gain
Aspen H. Yoo, Alfredo Bolaños, … Clayton E. Curtis·Journal of Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Dec 23, 2021
- Interplay between persistent activity and activity-silent dynamics in prefrontal cortex during working memory
João Barbosa, Heike Stein, … Albert Compte·Nature NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jun 22, 2020
- Layer-dependent activity in human prefrontal cortex during working memory
Emily S. Finn, Laurentius Huber, … Peter A. Bandettini·Nature NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Sep 23, 2019
- Distributed and drifting signals for working memory load in human cortex
Kirsten C. S. Adam, Edward Awh, John T. Serences·bioRxiv·Sep 15, 2025
- Discrete attractor dynamics underlying selective persistent activity in frontal cortex
H. Inagaki, Lorenzo Fontolan, … Karel Svoboda·NaturePeer-reviewed·Feb 1, 2019