bioRxivBiophysicsPreprint
Quantitative reanalysis of classic pigeon homing experiments rejects a liver-based magnetic compass based on superparamagnetism
Abstract
Lisowski et al. [1] recently proposed that the pigeon's magnetic compass resides in the liver and depends upon ferritin-containing macrophages operating through a superparamagnetic mechanism. Here we evaluate this hypothesis using behavioral, neurobiological, evolutionary, and biophysical evidence together with three original analyses. First, we present a quantitative reanalysis of the classic pigeon homing experiments of Walcott and Green [2], calculating for the first time the magnetic fringe-field distribution produced by the head-mounted coil apparatus. These calculations demonstrate that the liver would have experienced a maximum shift of about 1.4% of the ambient geomagnetic field, far too small to account for the observed orientation effects, thereby localizing the relevant magnetoreceptive structures to the region of the head and excluding the liver. Second, we quantify the magnetic alignment expected for ferritin cores under geomagnetic conditions and show that ferrihydrite nanoparticles are approximately five orders of magnitude too weak to resist thermal noise, while their superparamagnetic moments fluctuate on timescales roughly eleven orders of magnitude faster than those relevant to navigation. Third, we analyze the neurobiological requirements of magnetic navigation and show that mobile macrophages are unlikely to provide stable directional information because compass signals must be continuously cross-calibrated against vestibular and visual inputs within a body-centered reference frame. Comparative evidence from fish, birds, and turtles further associates magnetically responsive structures with craniofacial tissues and trigeminal sensory pathways. We suggest the disruption of the magnetic response is due to induced anemia from clodronate treatment that triggers dissolution and absorption of iron in the magnetite-containing cells involved in magnetoreception. Together these findings indicate that a liver-based ferritin compass is inconsistent with behavioral, neurobiological, and physical evidence and instead support cephalized magnetite-based receptor systems as the basis of avian magnetoreception.
- organism: multiple species
- assay: behavioral assay
- research focus: host-pathogen & immune response
- approach: statistical model
- approach: comparative / phylogenetic analysis
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Light-independent and pulsing-sensitive magnetic compass responses in planarians
Leif Moritz, Evelyn Schmidt, … Erich Pascal Malkemper·bioRxiv·Oct 2, 2026
- A magnetic pulse does not affect free-flight navigation behaviour of a medium-distance songbird migrant in spring
T. Karwinkel, M. Winklhofer, … H. Schmaljohann·bioRxiv·Apr 28, 2022
- Migratory birds are able to choose the appropriate migratory direction under dim yellow monochromatic light
N. Romanova, G. Utvenko, … A. Pakhomov·bioRxiv·Jan 13, 2023
- Migratory bats are sensitive to magnetic inclination during compass calibration
W. T. Schneider, R. A. Holland, … O. Lindecke·bioRxiv·May 3, 2023
- Birds are easier to trick: an effect of magnetic field manipulation on migratory orientation of Nathusius's pipistrelle in the circular release box
F. Cellarius, G. Utvenko, … A. Pakhomov·bioRxiv·Feb 20, 2023
- Magnetic sensitivity of cryptochrome 4a in domesticated quail with migratory origins
Rabea Bartölke, Kevin B. Henbest, … Henrik Mouritsen·bioRxiv·Feb 20, 2026