henhaobio
Sign in

Journal of Experimental BiologyNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article

Internally coupled middle ears enhance the range of interaural time differences heard by the chicken

Christine KöppliD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Interaural time differences (ITD) are one of several principle cues for localizing sounds. However, ITD are in the sub-millisecond range for most animals. Because the neural processing of such small ITDs pushes the limit of temporal resolution, the precise ITD-range for a given species and its usefulness - relative to other localization cues - was a powerful selective force in the evolution of the neural circuits involved. Birds and other non-mammals have internally coupled middle ears working as pressure-difference receivers that may significantly enhance ITD, depending on the precise properties of the interaural connection. Here, the extent of this internal coupling was investigated in chickens, specifically under the same experimental conditions as typically used in neurophysiology of ITD-coding circuits, i.e. with headphone stimulation. Cochlear microphonics (CM) were recorded simultaneously from both ears of anesthetized chickens under monaural and binaural stimulation, using pure tones from 0.1 to 3 kHz. Interaural transmission peaked at 1.5 kHz at a loss of only -5.5 dB; the mean interaural delay was 264 s. CM amplitude strongly modulated as a function of ITD, confirming significant interaural coupling. The \"ITD heard\" derived from the CM phases in both ears showed enhancement, compared to the acoustic stimuli, by a factor of up to 1.8. However, the closed sound delivery systems impaired interaural transmission at low frequencies (< 1 kHz). We identify factors that need to be considered when interpreting neurophysiological data obtained under these conditions, and relating them to the natural free-field condition.\n\nSummary statementThe interaural time differences that chickens can use for sound localization are significantly greater than their small head size suggests. Closed-system sound stimulation can, however, produce complex artefacts.

Citations
10
FWCI
0.72
Field percentile
top 37%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISAralla '24Leibold '25Borjigin '26Fang '26Goupell '24Roßkothen-K '21
75% semantic matchNeuroscience
Roberta Aralla, Claire Pauley, Christine Köppl·The Journal of Comparative Neurology·Jul 1, 2024· 2 citations