Journal of Experimental BiologyNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Internally coupled middle ears enhance the range of interaural time differences heard by the chicken
Abstract
Interaural time differences (ITD) are one of several principle cues for localizing sounds. However, ITD are in the sub-millisecond range for most animals. Because the neural processing of such small ITDs pushes the limit of temporal resolution, the precise ITD-range for a given species and its usefulness - relative to other localization cues - was a powerful selective force in the evolution of the neural circuits involved. Birds and other non-mammals have internally coupled middle ears working as pressure-difference receivers that may significantly enhance ITD, depending on the precise properties of the interaural connection. Here, the extent of this internal coupling was investigated in chickens, specifically under the same experimental conditions as typically used in neurophysiology of ITD-coding circuits, i.e. with headphone stimulation. Cochlear microphonics (CM) were recorded simultaneously from both ears of anesthetized chickens under monaural and binaural stimulation, using pure tones from 0.1 to 3 kHz. Interaural transmission peaked at 1.5 kHz at a loss of only -5.5 dB; the mean interaural delay was 264 s. CM amplitude strongly modulated as a function of ITD, confirming significant interaural coupling. The \"ITD heard\" derived from the CM phases in both ears showed enhancement, compared to the acoustic stimuli, by a factor of up to 1.8. However, the closed sound delivery systems impaired interaural transmission at low frequencies (< 1 kHz). We identify factors that need to be considered when interpreting neurophysiological data obtained under these conditions, and relating them to the natural free-field condition.\n\nSummary statementThe interaural time differences that chickens can use for sound localization are significantly greater than their small head size suggests. Closed-system sound stimulation can, however, produce complex artefacts.
- Citations
- 10
- FWCI
- 0.72
- Field percentile
- top 37%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Differences in the neural representation of binaural sound localization cues in the auditory midbrain of chicken and barn owl
Roberta Aralla, Claire Pauley, Christine Köppl·The Journal of Comparative NeurologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2024
- A mammalian inferior colliculus model for sound source separation using interaural time differences
Christian Leibold, Sebastian Groß·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 24, 2025
- Best Cochlear Locations for Delivering Interaural Timing Cues in Electric Hearing
Agudemu Borjigin, Stephen R. Dennison, … Ruth Y. Litovsky·Communications MedicinePeer-reviewed·Mar 10, 2026
- Neurophysiological Sensitivity to Envelope and Pulse Timing Interaural Time Differences in Cochlear Implanted Rats with Different Hearing Experiences
Shiyi Fang, T. Fleiner, … Jan W. H. Schnupp·The Journal of PhysiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 22, 2026
- The rapid decline in interaural-time-difference sensitivity for pure tones can be explained by peripheral filtering
Matthew J. Goupell, G. Christopher Stecker, … Daniel J. Tollin·Journal of the Association for Research in OtolaryngologyPeer-reviewed·May 20, 2024
- Microsecond Interaural Time Difference Discrimination Restored by Cochlear Implants After Neonatal Deafness
Nicole Roßkothen-Kuhl, Alexa N Buck, … Jan W. H. Schnupp·eLifePeer-reviewed·Jan 11, 2021