bioRxivEcologyPreprint
Criteria for effective fallow field eco schemes for farmland birds during non-breeding
M. R. Rieger, S. E. Mailaender, L. Stier, J. Staggenborg, N. Anthes
Abstract
O_LIFarmland eco schemes implemented under the current Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) of the European Union are often considered ineffective in halting farmland bird declines. Fallow fields, often seeded with dedicated seed mixtures, rate among the more beneficial eco scheme types. Yet, the CAP currently defines no minimum criteria for fallow fields to qualify as eco scheme, likely jeopardizing their potential biodiversity benefits. C_LIO_LIWe investigated the attractiveness of four fallow field types established under CAP eco schemes and dedicated bird conservation programs in Southern Germany. Our 2-year surveys on > 100 fields focused on the non-breeding season, where food limitation can become particularly problematic. We modelled bird incidences also in response to vegetation structure and adjacent landscape features to derive minimum criteria for effective fallow field eco schemes. C_LIO_LIFallow field types varied only mildly in overall species richness but showed striking differences in the attracted species. Finches in particular tended to preferentially visit 1-year fallow fields, while buntings tended towards 2-year and older field types. 1-year CAP fallows, however, are typically removed before mid-winter, and thus potentially act as a trap to farmland birds and other wildlife. C_LIO_LIThe investigated species consistently preferred larger fallow fields with a more differentiated vegetation structure. Placement close to woods and hedgerows positively affected birds inhabiting woodland ecotones, while classic farmland species showed higher incidences on fallow fields embedded in open landscapes. C_LIO_LI Policy implications Our findings call for the ongoing CAP revisions to specify minimum requirements that qualify fallow fields as eco schemes. These should include an at least biennial cycle, a diversification of seed mixtures, standards for fallow field size, and criteria for their placement in the landscape matrix. C_LI
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Losses and gains of fallows impact farmland bird populations over three funding periods of the EU Common Agricultural Policy
L. Hertzog, N. Roeder, … S. Klimek·bioRxiv·Oct 11, 2021
- Spatial and temporal variation in farmland bird nesting ecology: Implications for effective Corn Bunting Emberiza calandra conservation
Nils Anthes, Julia Staggenborg, Markus Handschuh·Bird Conservation InternationalPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Field margins as substitute habitat for the conservation of birds in agricultural wetlands
P. Mallet, A. Bechet, … T. Galewski·bioRxiv·May 5, 2022
- Breeding in an agricultural landscape: conservation actions increase nest survival in a ground-nesting bird
A. Kiss, T. Szekely, … S. Gori·bioRxiv·Oct 22, 2022
- Predicting the responses of the world's bird species to increases in agricultural production
Michela Busana, Ben Phalan, … Paul F. Donald·bioRxiv·Feb 11, 2025
- Balancing conservation priorities for grassland and forest specialist bird communities in agriculturally dominated landscapes
D. R. de Zwaan, N. Alavi, … S. Wilson·bioRxiv·Aug 5, 2021