bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
A Multiverse Approach to Brain Age Prediction: Exploring the Impact of Modality, Bias Adjustment, and Atlas
Abstract
Brain age, an individual's age predicted from neuroimaging data, is a promising biomarker of brain health. Yet brain age estimates may depend on methodological choices within the prediction pipeline. We used a multiverse approach to systematically investigate effects of data modality, bias-adjustment method, and brain parcellation on brain-age prediction using data from 560 healthy adults (18.6-89 years) from the CamCAN dataset. Across 84 pipeline conditions, chronological age was predicted from connectivity features with elastic net regression, and performance was evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE). A multilevel model tested the effects of the pipeline factors and their interactions; moreover, cross-atlas consistency of the most predictive connections was assessed. MAEs varied substantially across conditions (5.26-18.30 years). Modality and bias adjustment had significant effects on MAE and interacted significantly. Concatenating structural and functional connectivity performed similarly to structural connectivity alone, and structure-function coupling produced the highest MAE in most conditions. Beheshti-based bias adjustment outperformed Cole-based adjustment, while combining adjustment procedures did not consistently improve performance. Atlas choice had no main effect on MAE, its interaction with modality was significant but negligible in size, and finer parcellations did not systematically improve performance. However, the network-level features driving predictions showed limited spatial overlap across atlases, and importance was distributed over many features. Brain-age prediction is thus sensitive to methodological choices, particularly modality and bias-adjustment strategy. Atlas choice appears less important for predictive accuracy but may affect which connections appear most predictive. These findings highlight the importance of systematically evaluating analytical choices in brain-age research.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Predicting brain-age from multimodal imaging data captures cognitive impairment
Franziskus Liem, Gael P. Varoquaux, … Daniel S. Margulies·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Nov 23, 2016
- Multi-modality neuroimaging brain-age in UK Biobank: relationship to biomedical, lifestyle and cognitive factors
James Howard Cole·Neurobiology of AgingPeer-reviewed·Apr 8, 2020
- Mind the gap: performance metric evaluation in brain-age prediction
Ann‐Marie G. de Lange, Melis Anatürk, … James Howard Cole·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Mar 21, 2022
- Brain-Age Prediction: Systematic Evaluation of Site Effects, and Sample Age Range and Size
Yuetong Yu, H. Cui, … ENIGMA‐Lifespan Working Group·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2024
- Estimating brain age from structural MRI and MEG data: Insights from dimensionality reduction techniques
Alba Xifra‐Porxas, Arna Ghosh, … Marie‐Hélène Boudrias·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Feb 6, 2021
- A nonlinear simulation framework supports adjusting for age when analyzing BrainAGE.
Trang T. Le, Rayus Kuplicki, … Martin P. Paulus·Frontiers in Aging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Oct 24, 2018