Frontiers in Aging NeuroscienceBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
A nonlinear simulation framework supports adjusting for age when analyzing BrainAGE.
Trang T. LeiD, Rayus KuplickiiD, Brett Allen McKinneyiD, Hung‐Wen YehiD, Wesley K. ThompsoniD, Tulsa 1000 Investigators, Martin P. PaulusiD
Abstract
Several imaging modalities, including T1-weighted structural imaging, diffusion tensor imaging, and functional MRI can show chronological age related changes. Employing machine learning algorithms, an individuals imaging data can predict their age with reasonable accuracy. While details vary according to modality, the general strategy is to: 1) extract image-related features, 2) build a model on a training set that uses those features to predict an individuals age, 3) validate the model on a test dataset, producing a predicted age for each individual, 4) define the \"Brain Age Gap Estimate\" (BrainAGE) as the difference between an individuals predicted age and his/her chronological age, and 5) estimate the relationship between BrainAGE and other variables of interest, and 6) make inferences about those variables and accelerated or delayed brain aging. For example, a group of individuals with overall positive BrainAGE may show signs of accelerated aging in other variables as well. There is inevitably an overestimation of the age of younger individuals and an underestimation of the age of older individuals due to regression to the mean. The correlation between chronological age and BrainAGE may significantly impact the relationship between BrainAGE and other variables of interest when they are also related to age. In this study, we examine the detectability of variable effects under different assumptions. We use empirical results from two separate datasets [training=475 healthy volunteers, aged 18 - 60 years (259 female); testing=489 participants including people with mood/anxiety, substance use, eating disorders and healthy controls, aged 18 - 56 years (312 female)] to inform simulation parameter selection. Outcomes in simulated and empirical data strongly support the proposal that models incorporating BrainAGE should include chronological age as a covariate. We propose either including age as a covariate in step 5 of the above framework, or employing a multistep procedure where age is regressed on BrainAGE prior to step 5, producing BrainAGE Residualized (BrainAGER) scores.
- Citations
- 260
- FWCI
- 12.78
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Predicting brain-age from multimodal imaging data captures cognitive impairment
Franziskus Liem, Gael P. Varoquaux, … Daniel S. Margulies·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Nov 23, 2016
- Estimation of Brain Age Delta from Brain Imaging
Stephen M. Smith, Diego Vidaurre, … Karla L. Miller·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jun 12, 2019
- From a deep learning model back to the brain - inferring morphological markers and their relation to aging
Gidon Levakov, Gideon Rosenthal, … Galia Avidan·bioRxiv·Nov 5, 2019
- Assessing distinct patterns of cognitive aging using tissue-specific brain age prediction based on diffusion tensor imaging and brain morphometry
Geneviève Richard, Knut K. Kolskår, … Lars Tjelta Westlye·PeerJPeer-reviewed·Nov 30, 2018
- A Multiverse Approach to Brain Age Prediction: Exploring the Impact of Modality, Bias Adjustment, and Atlas
Jonas Festor, Lars Smolders, Wouter De Baene·bioRxiv·Oct 13, 2026
- Considerations on brain age predictions from repeatedly sampled data across time
Max Korbmacher, Mengyun Wang, … Karsten Specht·Brain and BehaviorPeer-reviewed·Aug 16, 2023