Forensic Science International GeneticsGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Weight of evidence of Y-STR matches computed with the discrete Laplace method: Impact of adding a suspect's profile to a reference database
Mikkel Meyer AnderseniD, Poul Svante ErikseniD, Niels MorlingiD
Abstract
The discrete Laplace method is recommended by multiple parties (including the International Society of Forensic Genetics, ISFG) to estimate the weight of evidence in criminal cases when a suspects Y-STR profile matches the crime scene Y-STR profile. Unfortunately, modelling the distribution Y-STR profiles in the database is time-consuming and requires expert knowledge. When the suspects Y-STR profile is added to the database, as would be the protocol in many cases, the discrete Laplace model must be recomputed. We found that the likelihood ratios with and without adding the suspects Y-STR profile were almost identical with 1,000 or more Y-STR profiles in the database for Y-STR profiles with 8, 12, and 17 loci. Thus, likelihood ratio calculations can be performed in seconds if a an established discrete Laplace model based on at least 1,000 Y-STR profiles is used. A match in a database with 17 Y-STR loci from at least 1,000 male individuals results in a likelihood ratio above 10,000 in approximately 94% of the cases, and above 100,000 in approximately 82% of the cases. We offer a freely available IT tool for estimating the discrete Laplace model of the STR profiles in a database and the likelihood ratio. HighlightsO_LIThe discrete Laplace method is suitable for estimating the weight of evidence of matches with 17 Y-STRs. C_LIO_LILRs based on the discrete Laplace method are 10-100 times higher (in median) than those based on Brenners{kappa} method. C_LIO_LIA database with 17 STRs from at least 1,000 males gives LRs of above 10,000 in approximately 94% of the cases and above 100,000 in approximately 82% of the cases with the discrete Laplace method. C_LIO_LIThe weight of evidence of a matching Y-STR profile is computed within seconds and easily documented when a precomputed discrete Laplace model is available (an IT tool is provided). C_LIO_LI50% of all Yfiler Plus matches are between male relatives within a genetic distance of five meioses. C_LI
- Citations
- 7
- FWCI
- 1.16
- Field percentile
- top 24%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Likelihood ratio estimation of partial Y-STR profile matches using discrete Laplace models and marginalisation
Tóra Oluffa Stenberg Olsen, Poul Svante Eriksen, … Mikkel Meyer Andersen·Forensic Science International GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 16, 2025
- Use of the Elston-Stewart algorithm for the efficient calculation of exact pedigree-based Y-STR match probabilities
Janne Berger, Michael Krawczak, … Iris Schulz·bioRxiv·Aug 19, 2026
- Probabilities of finding trace profile donors and their paternal relatives in Y-STR reference databases
Tóra Oluffa Stenberg Olsen, Niels Morling, … Mikkel Meyer Andersen·Forensic Science International GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 21, 2025
- How Convincing Is A Matching Y-Chromosome Profile?
Mikkel Meyer Andersen, David J. Balding·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Nov 3, 2017
- Y-profile evidence: close paternal relatives and mixtures
Mikkel Meyer Andersen, David J. Balding·Forensic Science International GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Oct 10, 2018
- Are genetically defined "metapopulations" self-evident in YHRD?
Tóra Oluffa Stenberg Olsen, Mikkel Meyer Andersen, … Amke Caliebe·Forensic Science International GeneticsPeer-reviewed·May 22, 2026