Journal of Neural EngineeringSystems BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
MuscleNET: Mapping Electromyography to kinematic and dynamic biomechanical variables by machine learning
Ali NasriD, Sydney BelliD, Jiayuan HeiD, Rachel L. WhittakeriD, Ning JiangiD, Clark R. DickersoniD, John McPheeiD
- Citations
- 52
- FWCI
- 2.96
- Field percentile
- top 8%
Abstract
ObjectiveThis paper proposes machine learning models for mapping surface electromyography (sEMG) signals to regression of joint angle, joint velocity, joint acceleration, joint torque, and activation torque. ApproachThe regression models, collectively known as MuscleNET, take one of four forms: ANN (Forward Artificial Neural Network), RNN (Recurrent Neural Network), CNN (Convolutional Neural Network), and RCNN (Recurrent Convolutional Neural Network). Inspired by conventional biomechanical muscle models, delayed kinematic signals were used along with sEMG signals as the machine learning models input; specifically, the CNN and RCNN were modeled with novel configurations for these input conditions. The models inputs contain either raw or filtered sEMG signals, which allowed evaluation of the filtering capabilities of the models. The models were trained using human experimental data and evaluated with different individual data. Main resultsResults were compared in terms of regression error (using the root-mean-square) and model computation delay. The results indicate that the RNN (with filtered sEMG signals) and RCNN (with raw sEMG signals) models, both with delayed kinematic data, can extract underlying motor control information (such as joint activation torque or joint angle) from sEMG signals in pick-and-place tasks. The CNNs and RCNNs were able to filter raw sEMG signals. SignificanceAll forms of MuscleNET were found to map sEMG signals within 2 ms, fast enough for real-time applications such as the control of exoskeletons or active prostheses. The RNN model with filtered sEMG and delayed kinematic signals is particularly appropriate for applications in musculoskeletal simulation and biomechatronic device control.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: machine learning (classical)
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Estimating muscle activation from EMG using deep learning-based dynamical systems models
Lahiru N. Wimalasena, Jonas Braun, … Chethan Pandarinath·Journal of Neural EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Apr 2, 2022
- Sensing the Full Dynamics of the Human Hand with a Neural Interface and Deep Learning
Raul Sîmpetru, Andreas Arkudas, … Alessandro Del Vecchio·bioRxiv·Jul 29, 2022
- NeuroMotion: Open-source Simulator with Neuromechanical and Deep Network Models to Generate Surface EMG signals during Voluntary Movement
S. Ma, I. M. Guerra, … D. Farina·bioRxiv·Oct 5, 2023
- Development of a real-time neural controller using an EMG-driven musculoskeletal model
Joe Thomas, Brokoslaw Laschowski·International Conference on Rehabilitation RoboticsPeer-reviewed·May 12, 2025
- Myoelectric Prosthesis Control using Recurrent Convolutional Neural Network Regression Mitigates the Limb Position Effect
H. E. Williams, A. W. Shehata, … P. M. Pilarski·bioRxiv·Feb 5, 2024
- A Comprehensive Mathematical Model of Surface Electromyography and Force Generation
Eike Petersen, Philipp Rostalski·Frontiers in PhysiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 7, 2019