Standardising a microbiome pipeline for body fluid identification from complex crime scene stains
Meghna SwayambhuiD, Mario GysiiD, Cordula HaasiD, Larissa Schuh, Larissa Walser, Fardin Javanmard, Tamara Flury, Sarah AhannachiD, Sarah LebeeriD, Eirik Nataas Hanssen, Lars Gustav SnipeniD, Nicholas A. BokulichiD, Rolf KümmerliiD, Natasha AroraiD
Abstract
BackgroundRecent advances in next-generation sequencing have opened up new possibilities for utilizing the human microbiome in various fields, including forensics. Researchers have capitalized on the site-specific microbial communities found in different parts of the body to identify body fluids from biological evidence. Despite promising results, microbiome-based methods have not yet been fully integrated into forensic practice due to the lack of standardized protocols and systematic testing of methods on forensically relevant samples. Our study addresses critical decisions in establishing these protocols, focusing on bioinformatics choices and the use of machine learning to present microbiome results in court for forensically relevant and challenging samples. ResultsWe propose using Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) for read data processing and creating heterogeneous training datasets for training a random forest classifier. Our classifier incorporates six forensically relevant classes: saliva, semen, hand skin, penile skin, urine, and vaginal/menstrual fluid. Across these classes, our classifier achieved a high weighted average F1 score of 0.89. Systematic testing on mixed-source samples and underwear revealed reliable detection of at least one component of the mixture and the identification of vaginal fluid from underwear substrates. Additionally, when investigating the sexually shared microbiome (sexome) of heterosexual couples, our classifier shows promising results for the inference of sexual activity. ConclusionIn our study, we recommend the use of a novel random forest classifier trained on a heterogenous dataset for obtaining predictions from samples mimicking forensic evidence. We also highlight the potential of the sexome for assessing the nature of sexual activities in forensic investigations, while delineating areas that warrant further research. Furthermore, we underscore key considerations when presenting machine learning results for classifying mixed-source samples.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Messenger RNA biomarker signatures for forensic body fluid identification revealed by targeted RNA sequencing
Erin Hanson, Sabrina Ingold, … Jack Ballantyne·Forensic Science International GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 5, 2018
- Facile semi-automated forensic body fluid identification by multiplex solution hybridization of NanoString® barcode probes to specific mRNA targets
Patrick Danaher, Robin Lynn White, … Jack Ballantyne·Forensic Science International: GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2015
- Advancing Biogeographical Ancestry Predictions Through Machine Learning
Carola Sophia Heinzel, Lennart Purucker, … Peter Pfaffelhuber·Forensic Science International GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 13, 2025
- BLAST-based validation of metagenomic sequence assignments
Adam L. Bazinet, Brian Ondov, … Shashikala Ratnayake·PeerJPeer-reviewed·May 28, 2018
- StrataBionn: a neural network supervised classification method for microbial communities
Alexander E Symons, Ashley Vera Huynh, Omar E. Cornejo·bioRxiv·Apr 2, 2026
- HUGMi: Human Uro-Genital Microbiome database and hybrid classifier for improved species level annotation of 16S rRNA amplicon sequences
Debaleena Bhowmik, Sandip Paul·bioRxiv·May 1, 2025