Communications BiologyNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Reputation risk during dishonest social decision-making modulates anterior insular and cingulate cortex activity and connectivity
Lennie DupontiD, Valerio SantangeloiD, Ruben T. AzevedoiD, Maria Serena PanasitiiD, Salvatore Maria AgliotiiD
Abstract
To explore the neural underpinnings of (dis)honest decision making under quasi-ecological conditions, we used an fMRI adapted version of a card game in which deceptive or truthful decisions are made to an opponent, with or without the risk of getting caught by them. Dishonest decisions were associated to increased activity in a cortico-subcortical circuit including the bilateral anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), anterior insula (AI), left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, supplementary motor area, and right caudate. Crucially, deceptive immoral decisions under reputation risk enhanced activity of - and functional connectivity between - the bilateral ACC and left AI, suggesting the need for heightened emotional processing and cognitive control when making immoral decisions under reputation risk. Tellingly, more manipulative individuals required less involvement of the ACC during risky self-gain lies but more involvement during other-gain truths, pointing to the need of cognitive control only when going against ones own moral code.
- Citations
- 15
- FWCI
- 4.43
- Field percentile
- top 6%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- When honest people cheat, and cheaters are honest: Cognitive control processes override our moral default
Sebastian P. H. Speer, Ale Smidts, Maarten A.S. Boksem·bioRxiv·Jan 23, 2020
- Unethical amnesia brain: Memory and metacognitive distortion induced by dishonesty
Xinyi Julia Xu, Dean Mobbs, Haiyan Wu·bioRxiv·Mar 3, 2024
- Individual differences in (dis)honesty are represented in the brain's functional connectivity:Robust out-of-sample prediction of cheating behavior
Sebastian P. H. Speer, Ale Smidts, Maarten A.S. Boksem·bioRxiv·May 12, 2020
- Dynamic valuation bias explains social influence on cheating behavior
Julien Bénistant, Valentin Guigon, … Jean‐Claude Dreher·bioRxiv·May 21, 2024
- Contributions of insula and superior temporal sulcus to interpersonal guilt and responsibility in social decisions
Maria Gädeke, Tom Willems, … Johannes Schultz·bioRxiv·May 25, 2020
- Contribution of self- and other-regarding motives to (dis)honesty
Anastasia Shuster, Dino J. Levy·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Sep 28, 2020