GigaScienceGenetic & Genomic MedicinePeer-reviewed journal article
The Great Genotyper: A Graph-Based Method for Population Genotyping of Small and Structural Variants
Moustafa ShokrofiD, Mohamed AbuelaniniD, C. Titus BrowniD, Tamer A. MansouriD
Abstract
1Long-read sequencing (LRS) enables variant calling of high-quality structural variants (SVs). Genotypers of SVs utilize these precise call sets to increase the recall and precision of genotyping in short-read sequencing (SRS) samples. With the extensive growth in availabilty of SRS datasets in recent years, we should be able to calculate accurate population allele frequencies of SV. However, reprocessing hundreds of terabytes of raw SRS data to genotype new variants is impractical for population-scale studies, a computational challenge known as the N+1 problem. Solving this computational bottleneck is necessary to analyze new SVs from the growing number of pangenomes in many species, public genomic databases, and pathogenic variant discovery studies. To address the N+1 problem, we propose The Great Genotyper, a population genotyping workflow. Applied to a human dataset, the workflow begins by preprocessing 4.2K short-read samples of a total of 183TB raw data to create an 867GB Counting Colored De Bruijn Graph (CCDG). The Great Genotyper uses this CCDG to genotype a list of phased or unphased variants, leveraging the CCDG population information to increase both precision and recall. The Great Genotyper offers the same accuracy as the state-of-the-art genotypers with the addition of unprecedented performance. It took 100 hours to genotype 4.5M variants in the 4.2K samples using one server with 32 cores and 145GB of memory. A similar task would take months or even years using single-sample genotypers. The Great Genotyper opens the door to new ways to study SVs. We demonstrate its application in finding pathogenic variants by calculating accurate allele frequency for novel SVs. Also, a premade index is used to create a 4K reference panel by genotyping variants from the Human Pangenome Reference Consortium (HPRC). The new reference panel allows for SV imputation from genotyping microarrays. Moreover, we genotype the GWAS catalog and merge its variants with the 4K reference panel. We show 6.2K events of high linkage between the HPRCs SVs and nearby GWAS SNPs, which can help in interpreting the effect of these SVs on gene functions. This analysis uncovers the detailed haplotype structure of the human fibrinogen locus and revives the pathogenic association of a 28 bp insertion in the FGA gene with thromboembolic disorders.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: variant calling
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- approach: graph neural network
- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.60
- Field percentile
- top 37%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Paragraph: A graph-based structural variant genotyper for short-read sequence data
Sai Chen, Peter Krusche, … Michael A. Eberle·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2019
- GGTyper: genotyping complex structural variants using short-read sequencing data
Tim Mirus, Robert Lohmayer, … Birte Kehr·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 19, 2024
- Evaluation of computational genotyping of Structural Variations for clinical diagnoses.
Varuna Chander, Richard A. Gibbs, Fritz Joachim Sedlazeck·GigaSciencePeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2019
- Genotyping structural variants in pangenome graphs using the vg toolkit
Glenn Hickey, David Heller, … Benedict Paten·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 12, 2020
- SVJedi: Genotyping structural variations with long reads
Lolita Lecompte, Pierre Peterlongo, … Claire Lemaitre·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·May 18, 2020
- SVarp: pangenome-based structural variant discovery
Arda Söylev, Jana Ebler, … Tobias Marschall·bioRxiv·Feb 18, 2024